How Not To Beat Apple In In-Store Mobile POS

Written by Frank Hayes
November 3rd, 2011

If you want a perfect snapshot of how dominant Apple has become for in-store mobile POS devices—and why—look no further than Hewlett Packard’s mobile POS announcement on Thursday (Nov. 3): a payment-card sled that attaches to HP’s new Slate 2 tablet. This is bound to be a tough sell—remember, HP has just killed off a tablet line in a very public fashion (even though that wasn’t the Windows-based Slate line).

The HP tablet-and-sled combo together will be a hefty $1,200. Competing with Apple means HP will need to nail this product perfectly—right? Yes, that’s what HP needed. But instead of offering the tablet and sled as a general-purpose in-store mobile POS, HP is positioning it largely as an add-on to HP’s own POS systems. OK, that limits the market. So does the lack of a clear advantage over an iPad.

Dick Arnold, the director of worldwide marketing for HP’s global retail business unit, stressed that the key benefit of Windows will be its ability to integrate down the road, when retailers want to do functions more advanced than simple payments, such as Web interactions, detailed POS integration (including inventory updates) and controlling in-store digital signage. “There a very high premium on making sure it can interact with the retailer’s POS environment, to be seamless,” Arnold said.

That’s a fair point, but he then undermined that point when he declined to say that iPads wouldn’t work fine with most retailers’ systems, too. Being compatible is great, but for it to be a sales point, the point needs to be that your product is more compatible. If other systems will be just as good, that’s not a differentiator.

Then there’s the mag-stripe reader, which can work right out of the box in unencrypted mode. Wait, isn’t that exactly what retailers don’t want?

In fairness, it wouldn’t make sense to ship a payment-card sled with a default encryption key already installed—it would just have to be replaced. But what message does it send to retailers when a major POS vendor makes it a point to mention that its mobile mag-stripe sled can work in unencrypted mode—the mode that’s guaranteed to torpedo the retailer’s PCI approval?

HP didn’t have to design out that unencrypted mode, or even take special measures to disable it. But it’s painful to see a POS vendor bullet-point a “feature” that target customers are sure not to want.

It’s easy to overstate Apple’s reputation for sweating the design details of its products. It’s also naive to assume that just because Apple runs its own retail chain, it’s guaranteed to have flawless insight into what retailers need. But if any other vendor wants to catch up to the iPOS juggernaut, they’d better at least know PCI.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.