advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Is A Network Printer Increasing Your PCI Vulnerability?

February 9th, 2011

Two things are different here. Not only is this a proven attack that can uncover user credentials remotely, but it also can provide network access to other devices that may contain sensitive data. Beyond the cleartext usernames and passwords referenced above, there are other risks. If the attacker connects to the networked printer/copier/scanner in, say, a chargeback or card processing center, the thief could remotely order scans to capture documents left on the device. The attacker may be able to get away with this activity for long periods of time, because printers usually are not subject to the types of monitoring that would normally apply to other servers.

These attacks could be executed remotely, so the hacker never needs to expose himself. Furthermore, the attack does not require particularly sophisticated techniques. It is an old-school attack on a new-school device. In my colleague’s experience, the attacks are about 90 percent successful. Too many people fall prey to a “set and forget” mentality when installing a printer—setting the password once and assuming the device is always doing everything right forever after.

IT departments can mitigate the risk of falling prey to this vulnerability in several ways. First, assume the devices are vulnerable and restrict access to them, and then segment them on their own network and protect them behind firewalls or other devices. Many companies take these precautions already, but many others allow the printers direct access to the Internet. This option makes them—and any system connected to them—particularly vulnerable, because anyone on the planet could access your unhardened network devices.

Ultimately, in the long term, it is up to the manufacturers to re-architect their products to protect the information. It also would be great if they could offer a way to retrofit additional security onto existing devices, so they at least did not store user credentials in cleartext. We can only hope that at least some manufacturers will see a marketing advantage and bring more secure devices to the market.

What do you think? Do you still think a paper jam is the biggest problem with your printer? I’d like to hear your thoughts. Either leave a comment or E-mail me at wconway@403labs.com.


advertisement

4 Comments | Read Is A Network Printer Increasing Your PCI Vulnerability?

  1. jml Says:

    I’m hazy on what’s being discussed here, and don’t seem to find a definitive reference.

    Are you saying that there are domain-aware multifunction devices that cache domain credentials in cleartext, or are you working the angle that all other things considered, people are likely to use their domain credentials in some local store of passwords on the multifunction device?

  2. the other anonymous Says:

    Search youtube for “shmoocon printer pwnd” to a presentation on leveraging weak security controls on printers to gain network access.

  3. Walt Conway Says:

    Thanks for the comments and questions. To jml’s quetion: I was saying that these multi-function devices do indeed store credentials in cleartext, and that sometimes these are domain credentials. Since the devices are frequently open to the Internet this means the device can provide a pathway to compromise other systems.

    To “the other anonymous”: Here are some sources for additional insights. MSNBC picked up the story (http://news.mobile.msn.com/en-us/article_tech.aspx?aid=41302075&afid=1) as did Technology Review (http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/27121/page1/). If you want to see the presentation made at Shmoocon, here is a UTube link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPhisPLwm2A).

  4. SoftwareDeveloper Says:

    I wouldn’t think the devices would just go out and get the indormation. How about discussing where the information is coming from. Do you think that if a person writes this information on a piece of paper that the same problem exists? I can either copy what I find on the paper or scan it, OMG not its on a multifunction device.

    Do you think I need to shoot my partner because she has access to information that I have secured in my desk?

    This is getting insane.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.