Is Google Experimenting With In-Store Images?

Written by Evan Schuman
February 18th, 2010

Google is reportedly experimenting with a new service—to complement its Google Street Views—that will shoot pictures and videos within stores and combine all of the images in its database. If you cast aside all of the out-of-date issues inherent with infrequent store images being shown as more-or-less current, this concept has serious potential.

How many stores have you peeked into and, within four seconds, decided this wasn’t the place where you want to shop for a particular item? Had you seen an image before driving, might you have saved yourself some time?

Let’s flip it the other way. You’re in the market for a new couch. Your Google search shows you a page with 35 results and they all, at a glance, seem interchangeable. You’ve already limited your search geographically, so most of these places (OK, granted, Google’s geography limiter doesn’t do much) are nearby. Most consumers tend to only focus on the first two or three results and choose from there.

But what if there were thumbnail photographs of the insides of all of those stores, sized and positioned so that you could meaningfully flip through them all in seconds? Might that draw your eye to Result 26? How about if the search results showed streaming video and even images allowing you to take a 360-degree tour? Consumers are visual, and they can meaningfully digest 50 images far easier than 50 text descriptions.

But addressing that first complaint: out of date. What if this Google program allowed retailers to stream live video of the store to Google? (Does Legal need to get permission of random visitors to the store? I’ll rephrase: Has Legal ever said that it did not need to get someone’s permission for anything?) Now the displays are always current and you control what is being shown. And it’s being beamed to people searching for your product/service.

If Google Store Views is ever launched, it has the potential to be a very powerful retail tool. Assuming, of course, that you’re brave enough to beam anything happening in your store to the world. Come to think of it, it might cut down on shoplifting, too.


One Comment | Read Is Google Experimenting With In-Store Images?

  1. ME Says:

    This has the potential to be a big money maker for store fronts and a big plus for potential customers. I know for a fact that I have already been per-using the street view afforded by Google whenever I am going to be visiting a new business establishment, looking to see how the store is and if there is relative ease of parking spaces or not. A win-win situation. Stores get more traffic and for those stores that do not come on board, well, I would not be going there as they probably are not kept-up anyway.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.