Is It Time To Sharply Shrink Pre-Auth Holds?

Written by Evan Schuman
February 23rd, 2012

Given that mobile is almost certainly going to drive a lot more virtual stored value offerings throughout retail, it might be a good time to rethink how retail handles payment pre-auth holds.

Consider today’s situation: A shopper is driving to the mall to use a new giftcard she’s been sent and she pulls into a gas station en route. She says “fill ‘er up” and hands the attendant the giftcard. Given that it’s an unknown amount, the attendant keys in $100 and starts pumping. The final bill is $35, the customer gets her receipt and drives off to the mall.

When she tries to buy something at the mall, she discovers the card has been emptied and it won’t be restored for 2 to 3 days. Back in October, Visa made a change that was supposed to sharply shorten hold times, but issuers and others have not accelerated nearly enough.

Visa’s change was that it enabled acquirers and retailers to send a memo within two hours of an Automated Fuel Dispenser (AFD) transaction on the final sale amount. “These memos inform participating issuers of the final AFD transaction amounts. As a result of this enhancement, cardholders may receive more accurate balance information within minutes of purchasing fuel and have better access to funds due to more accurate holds,” Visa said.

Visa’s action is helpful, but the decision will be implemented by issuers and processors.

Hold problems today may not be daily occurrences. But with a lot of mobile-fueled stored value products coming, lobbying to get holds reduced to a few minutes after the actual transaction amount is known could prove to be a very wise move.

Who is impacted by all of this? There are two answers to that. The first are gas stations and hotels and a relatively small number of other types of merchants that have to process payment before knowing the final amount.

The second answer, though, is more useful. Under the scenario of that woman visiting the gas station while driving to the mall, the gas station people are not really impacted. They got their money and suffered no disruption. The pain is felt by the next retailer, by the merchant the shopper goes to afterward and tries—unsuccessfully—to buy something with the stored value. That retailer is deprived of the sale, possibly permanently, because that angry and embarrassed customer may not return.

Therefore, this impacts just about every retailer. Mobile is going to be pushing far more stored value type transactions—of the virtual type—and that will make these situations even more commonplace.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.