Is PCI “Mission Accomplished”? Hardly

Written by Evan Schuman
January 25th, 2008

This guestview column is from David Taylor, president of the PCI Security Vendor Alliance.
This week, Visa painted a very rosy picture of PCI compliance among merchants when they announced that 77 percent of Level 1 US merchants are compliant and 62 percent of Level 2 merchants are now compliant. While I applaud Visa for having the courage and spending the money for incentives to encourage compliance, the process of achieving PCI compliance has, for some merchants, resulted in a shift away from a strategic approach to security toward what can only be called a "checklist mentality."

As part of a research program recently launched by the PCI Alliance, we’ve talked to quite a few merchants who feel that the drive to PCI compliance has caused them to make some security technology choices that are contrary to their system architectures and prior planning. Others have expressed concerns that they are simply not able to process all the data they are collecting from their various auditing and logging tools, which means they are getting little value from the many thousands of dollars they have spent, other than the "PCI Compliant" seal of approval.

The bright side is that for merchants that had done little in the way of data security or were still retaining track data or CVV data, PCI compliance demands "woke them up" to the importance of removing this data from their systems, which greatly reduces the card fraud risk.

But this still leaves the bigger question: What is the relationship between compliance and security? Our research, so far, leads us to the conclusion that because PCI DSS is so very detailed as to required technologies, unlike SOX or HIPAA, that it becomes very easy for upper management, who rightfully know little about data security, to make the assumption that after they’ve spent $100K – $500K (or whatever) on security, that they should be "done with all that nonsense." So, when the CISO or CIO goes back in and says "Sorry, but that money was just for protecting credit and debit cards, we also have to protect all our other confidential data," they won’t be too surprised when the CEO starts yelling at them.

So, Visa’s very happy, but where does all this spending on compliance leave merchants? Many are re-thinking the headlong rush to find and protect card data, as opposed to all confidential data. Others are wondering whether all the rushing around, all the compensating controls, and all the pretending to be nice to the assessors was really worth it, in terms of actually securing their environment, and giving the tools they really need to continuously monitor both internal and external threats to their data.

In short, though a majority of merchants may be PCI compliant, they are still "whistling past the graveyard" with their fingers crossed – which is a pretty effective security strategy.

P.S. We are working with IT research firm TheInfoPro to develop a PCI Knowledge Base, where merchants can learn about the PCI compliance experiences of others, as well as get advice from a panel of PCI experts. To help build this PCI Knowledge Base, we are conducting a series of anonymous interviews with merchants. You don’t need to be fully compliant to participate. The interview, which I will personally conduct, is about the process of compliance. If you’d like to learn more, or like to sign up to be anonymously interviewed, please provide your contact information.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.