advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Is Whole Foods Launching Ultra-Smart Carts? Not Exactly

February 29th, 2012

The problem is with how Kinect finds people it needs to follow. Kinect puts out a field of infrared dots with a laser and looks at the resultant distortion, Wheat said. “Above a certain light level, it washes out those dots,” he said. In effect, it would make the customer suddenly invisible to the cart.

Avoiding parking lots is probably a good idea anyway. The carts won’t likely take well to rain or snow. Besides, the Kinect portion costs about $150, the motor system about $1,000. And then there’s the cost of the tablet and the cart itself. Yeah, you probably don’t want shoppers leaving the store with them.

There’s also a question of whether customers in an environmentally friendly chain such as Whole Foods would appreciate wasting energy on a battery-powered cart. The current carts run on a pair of 12-volt batteries (that’s mostly for the motor and is above and beyond the power needs of the tablet) and the testing model will use up all of that juice within 2 to 3 hours, Wheat said.

The cart’s interface with the customer seems to be primarily through speaking. Again, that’s nice in a demo. But in a crowded aisle full of rush-hour shoppers, we’re not so sure the cacophony of a dozen carts talking past each other would be optimal. Beyond the annoyance, it would likely undermine any store attempts at creating a pleasant, music-enhanced shopping environment.

Also, what if one customer’s cart reacted to a verbal instruction intended for a different cart? That could create a different type of chaos with well-meaning customers, let alone what a not-so-well-meaning person could do to make trouble. (Hey! Why is everyone looking at me?)

Wheat said his team is also concerned about store aisles crowded with shoppers and then “having all of the carts talking at once.” Chaotic Moon Labs is trying to at least help the units know which voice they are supposed to obey.

“The carts themselves have microphone arrays” and they calculate the angle that its master’s voice should be coming from.

Now to the good stuff. The consumer begins this cart interaction by showing the cart his/her loyalty card, which the cart apparently detects via an RFID reader.

That’s another heads-up that this is an odd fit for Whole Foods. The $10 billion chain, with 317 stores in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, shuns loyalty cards. Heck, last year the chain swore off accepting checks. Why? “We simply don’t want the burden of having all that information,” Letton said at the time.

But this cart seems to have no such problem with data retention. It leads the customer through a journey of fulfilling her already submitted shopping list, presumably created through a mobile app or on a Web site and wirelessly accessed by the cart.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.