advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

It May be Time to Switch Card Processors

April 1st, 2009
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Many merchants continue to object to having anyone keep their card data other than themselves. Often, these are leading merchants that have made significant investments in data security and they simply do not believe that any other company has more motivation (or better technology) than they do to protect their data. For these companies, they should look to processors who can support end-to-end encryption, which some processors see as their next generation card data security offering.

    In this case, the service includes both consistent encryption access control and management, as well as a key management service. It is key management, of course, that is the hard part of all this, and such services amount to having a central key repository, managed by the processor.

    But even in such scenarios, data should still be centralized whenever possible, mainly because key rotation, which must be done annually to meet PCI standards, can still bring down enterprise applications for 48 hours while all the data is being re-encrypted with the new keys. Nonetheless, this type of system is an important option for those merchants who want to retain more control of their card data.

  • Other “Beyond PCI” Technologies
    Last week, Storefront Backtalk published an article on pilot tests of new security technologies and procedures by banks, processors and Visa that go beyond the current PCI standards to secure card data. I expect to see lots of similar efforts designed to leverage merchant concerns about card data security and the desire to minimize the retention of card data. Processors talk about several “secret sauce” tactics that have yet to make it to the pilot stage, but which will find their way into the market during 2009. In each case, the technologies are an effort to re-introduce some of the technical competitive advantage that the PCI standards have taken away.

  • The Bottom Line
    Switching card processors is much easier than some merchants think, but you shouldn’t switch just to get a lower transaction processing costs. Considering what is at stake, it is well worth time to discuss card data security technologies and procedures with your current and prospective card processors. PCI project managers and IT security managers should be part of any discussion related to switching card processors, which is often not the case today. For more information on this, visit the
    PCI Knowledge Base and if you’d like to discuss trends in the industry or your own experiences, please send me an E-mail at David.Taylor@KnowPCI.com.


  • advertisement

    Comments are closed.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.