Item-Level RFID Being Crippled Due To Retail IT Fears

Written by Frank Hayes
November 9th, 2011

Is item-level RFID a surveillance technology? Of course it is, if you’re a thief—particularly a sticky-fingered employee. When missing product can be routinely discovered within hours instead of weeks, it’s much easier to scan store security recordings to spot the theft. RFID wasn’t designed for surveillance—that’s just a side effect. Another side effect: item-level RFID’s ability to let executives track exactly how well stock is moving in and out of stores on a daily basis. If you’re the manager of a store with problems, that might feel like surveillance, too.

For many retail IT execs, it’s more than a little uncomfortable. Store managers are on the same side as IT. Setting up systems to see who’s underperforming—and exactly how, in near-real-time—can feel, well, a little dirty. Maybe that’s why so few chains are doing it—and why most of the systems offered by vendors for using RFID data aren’t built for that type of visibility. “Our number-one fight with software vendors is, your software doesn’t do enough,” said American Apparel VP of Technology Stacey Shulman. “‘Well, it’s what everybody else uses.’ Well, it’s not enough.”

That’s the politically incorrect reality of the visibility that item-level RFID can deliver if it’s done properly. It’s not just visibility into inventory. It can also be visibility into how each store is being run. More, that visibility extends all the way back to corporate—and it lets management look over store managers’ shoulders in real time. As American Apparel’s Shulman, who has rolled out item-level RFID in 100 of her stores and is pushing it into the company’s other 150 stores, put it: “You start to see problems you had all along.” It’s just not polite to point that out.

Item-level RFID is quite popular these days, but are chains—for a wide range of reasons—leaving a lot of ROI dollars on the table? Certainly Wal-Mart, JCPenney and Macy’s are talking about how RFID will help keep shelves stocked, especially for hard to track product categories such as apparel. But are they going beyond that?

Shulman is blunt about her belief that RFID is wasted if it’s only used for sales-floor replenishment. “Right now, people are focused on counting,” she said. “Unfortunately, people did the Banana Republic model”—just replenishment—”and are getting a tenth of the benefit of the system.”

And where’s the other 90 percent of the benefit? Management and visibility. “I get reports every day that let me see exactly how many items are missing, exactly which stores need to cycle count, exactly what the trend has been, exactly the in-stock percentage, exactly what stores are having problems,” Shulman said.

That’s kicking RFID up from a way of counting inventory to a way of tracking store management. In practice, that means tracking how well store managers are doing their jobs. And for managers who aren’t running their stores well, that comes down to surveillance—not to see whether they’re criminals but to see whether they’re failing the business.

In a perfect world, that wouldn’t be necessary—and for many retail IT execs, it’s more than a little uncomfortable.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.