Javelin Report: Retailers Have No Reason To Support Contactless Payment

Written by Evan Schuman
April 24th, 2008

Although contactless payment has tremendous potential to advance payments and set the stage for mobile commerce, it’s suffering from benign neglect from both retailers and the card brands—and banks, too. That according to a new contactless payment report from analyst firm Javelin Strategy & Research.

The key argument of the report is that none of the three groups of companies involved—the card brands, the issuing banks and key retailers—is spending the dollars to create true incentives to make contactless payment work, said lead report author Bruce Cundiff, who is Javelin’s director of payments research.

"There is no effective value proposition for merchants and for wireless carriers," Cundiff said.

For example, the most effective way to jumpstart contactless payment would be at the retail level. If retailers were given a strong incentive—such as a significant interchange rate reduction for contactless payment transactions—to push contactless, it would happen. The retailer might even pass on a tiny portion of those savings to its customers, offering them special discounts if they use contactless.

Now the consumers are actively trying to figure out if any of their cards are contactless—many consumers who are carrying contactless cards don’t know it–and, if not, some will likely call their banks to ask for them. Those consumer calls to the banks will likely get noticed and will increase production.

But someone has to start that cycle. Without any incentives, retailers have little reason to pay for the POS upgrades. And if they have made those upgrades anyway, they have just as little incentive to push the new payment method. Without retail incentives, fewer consumers will bother. A vicious—but entirely predictable—cycle.

So why won’t the banks offer incentives? Chase, for example, has no reason to do so, Cundiff said, because they’re thinking, "We’re making the same money on these cards regardless of whether they use contactless or magstripe" so why bother?

The bank gets the buzz from offering contactless, without having to really push it. "They don’t care how many contactless transactions they get. They pay lip service to it," Cundiff said.

The next move for contactless "will be delayed until the primary players—card networks, financial institutions, mobile carriers, merchants, and handset manufacturers—treat the field as a symbiotic ecosystem rather than an economic battlefield," the report said. "To drive the next phase of adoption of contactless payments, card networks must do something counterintuitive and somewhat risky. They must nurture an environment for merchants to create seemingly competitive products: closedloop gift cards and private-label cards. The card networks’ risk is that transaction volume for network-branded products will slip. But the payoff is far greater. It will create a robust contactless infrastructure, hinder the development of products and networks from threatening powerhouses such as PayPal and Google, and spur wireless carriers to push the spread of NFC technology."


One Comment | Read Javelin Report: Retailers Have No Reason To Support Contactless Payment

  1. Petri Aukia Says:

    The Finnish university student body card has a contactless prepaid payment system attached to it. There is a small discount for services, the cards needed to be issed anyway and since the issuer is not the usual credit card company, they benefit as well. For the student diners or fast food outlets the benefit may be the decreased cost of handling cash and the automatic student deduction mechanism.
    Maybe contactless will happen first at the fringes and not at WalMart?



StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.