Jell-O’s Dessert-Dispensing Age-Checking Kiosk Has Much Age-Restricted Potential

Written by Evan Schuman
January 4th, 2012

When Kraft’s and Intel recently started showing off their age-detecting kiosk—a vending machine that dispenses Jell-O pudding and other desserts only to consumers it calculates are old enough to appreciate them—it was yet another in a long line of age-guessing systems. This one, though, has the potential to help retailers at least minimize some hassles from selling age-restricted products.

The age-detection part—as demoed in this Intel video—uses an optical sensor to consider the customer’s face shape, along with distance measurements between the eyes, nose and ears. The idea of automating age-verification is hardly new, nor are some of the almost laughable failures in those efforts, such as this story from Japan about such a system that was fooled by a kid holding a picture ripped out of a magazine.

Of course, the importance of making the age determination accurately varies with the application. With this Kraft effort, no serious harm comes from an 8-year-old being given the dessert, nor from a 22-year-old who is told she looks too young. (Then again, even if the system works, it may be a well-thought-out strategy. Does Kraft really want to tempt kids with high-resolution dessert images and then deny them a taste? Yeah, that will establish a lot of great future goodwill.)

But when the restrictions are serious and legal—think cigarettes and alcohol—can a retailer rely on a kiosk’s measuring skills? What if a 12-year-old has a very long face? There actually is a way such a system could be useful.

If used as the sole determination point, it’s a terrible idea. What if it’s merely a filter? What if it does most of the work of age verification, but leaves the final decision to an associate? Perhaps the associate would have to look at the customer and then hit a button, sort of the kiosk equivalent of buzzing someone into an apartment building.

Granted, that seems like a very expensive way to marginally accelerate operations. But if a store gets a lot of time-killing under-age requests, this could help. Also, it could be set up so the associate’s involvement is barely noticeable, enabling the machine to take the heat for the denial. Purchase denials can be emotional and can get dangerous. This could have the psychological effect of deflating those situations.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.