advertisement
advertisement

Know Your Enemy

Written by Evan Schuman
September 6th, 2007

Retailers of all sizes need to intensify their data security protections, but different kinds of threats merit different kinds of defenses.

With all of the PCI and data breach talk these days, it’s easy for retailers of all sizes to be on edge. Although it’s undeniable that merchants and all sizes need to protect themselves, different issues threaten Wal-Mart and Phil’s Bait Shop.

Larger retailers can be seen as the better targets in the Willy Sutton School Of Thought (when asked why he robbed banks, the legendary holdup man is said to have replied, “That’s where the money is”). But smaller merchants can be attractive for the opposite reason, namely that they are likely to have less sophisticated defenses.

The term cyber thief today actually describes bad guys in three very distinct groups:

The Professional Cyberthief, typified by the Eastern European folk. They do this for a living, have top-notch equipment and a healthy number of people. They want soft targets and big ones. For these folk, stealing 100,000 data-packages is worthless because they know how many will be nullified quickly. They want to grab tens of millions of packages at a time so they can still end up with a healthy number of usable ones. Hence, they only go after the biggest of the retailers. Mom-and-pops have virtually nothing to fear from these folk.

The amateur cyberthief, typified by the suburban teen-age male. Although they?ll enjoy the money, they?re in it for the thrill, for the sport of it. So they want hard targets. The bigger the challenge, the more the fun.

This is why smart retail CIOs never want to discuss their own security, even in vague terms. If they say they have some holes to fix, it’s blood-in-the-water to the Eastern Euro sharks. If they instead say they’re airtight, it’s the red cape for the suburban teen-age bull. Choose your poison.

These amateurs typically target high-profile places (Pentagon, Wal-Mart, Disney, Google, etc.) because they want the publicity. Sometimes, though, these HREF hoodlums will target a very local retailer that is well-known in their group. Mom-and-pops generally have nothing to fear from these folk, unless it?s a popular hangout. Then it can become a target.

The professional thief, who is not (or at least was not) a cyberthief. This is your crowbar set that often does old-fashioned shop-lifting and burglaries.

A good recent example was a gang that physically attacked POS keypads with the Stop and Shop grocery chain.

The crowbar crew are more worried about security guards and surveillance cameras and usually work in teams, primarily to block or distract. Mom-and-pop retailers have much to fear from these folk. The Wal-Marts of the world have better surveillance systems and are not the crowbar set?s top choice, but they’ll go there if it’s especially convenient.

The problem with the threat confusion is that security vendors like to group these folk together because that’s easier to sell. To paraphrase the hammer-nail clich?, when all you have to sell are high-end deadbolts, you?d better make people think they?re being overrun by crooked locksmiths. The only problem: there are a lot of folk out there with sledgehammers looking for a wall.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.