Kroger’s Geolocation Glitch: That Local Store Really Isn’t Very Local

Written by Frank Hayes
October 31st, 2012

At the Web site for $85 billion grocer Kroger, the site makes its best guess for the customer’s location. But this week it identified a New Jersey customer as being in Missouri and located an Oregon visitor in Texas—off by more than 1,000 miles each time.

Was that a storm-related glitch? We’re still waiting for an answer from Kroger, and we know that location feature has worked fine for at least some shoppers in the past. But considering how critical geolocation is in merged-channel retail (where’s the closest store? What’s on sale right now?) and the fact that IP addresses can often be tied to other CRM data, this may be a good reminder of how tricky outsourcing location services can get. Even if your datacenter is safely out of harm’s way, an outside location provider can still be inside a disaster zone and may need its own third-party help—and end up scattering your E-Commerce credibility all over the map. So many other things can impact location accuracy: A VPN can throw it off, and an ISP’s own disaster plans can alter where others think your customers are. Then again, it’s not especially onerous for customers to fix their location, as long as the site makes that at an easy fix.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.