MasterCard Goes Mobile With Chip-And-PIN Displays

Written by Fred J. Aun
November 19th, 2009

For regions where chip-and-PIN payment cards are popular, primarily Europe (and definitely not the U.S.), MasterCard is doing something that could boost Mobile Commerce: Users of both regular cell phones and Java-enabled smartphones can now get payment passwords displayed on their devices.

“This is interesting in that it’s the first public announcement I’ve seen, at least from a major player, to leverage the mobile phone to secure a card-based transaction,” said payments expert Todd Ablowitz, president of Double Diamond Group. “Of course, the question, as always, is about adoption. Can MasterCard and the other players looking to secure card-not-present (CNP) transactions get merchant and consumer adoption? How long will it take? No doubt there is a high level of fraud in CNP transactions, especially as related to card-present transactions, but will this be the solution? It remains to be seen. In the payments industry, that can take a long time to play out.”

MasterCard is offering two types of the new mobile Chip Authentication Program (CAP), an SMS version and a downloadable app for smartphones. Both options present single-use passwords.

With the SMS version, the one-use password is sent within a text message to a user’s cell phone when the consumer reaches the point in the checkout process where the site asks for the secure code. Smartphone owners using the installed MasterCard app have their one-time-use passwords displayed after they enter a PIN.

“This new development leverages the ubiquitous nature of mobile phones,” said a MasterCard statement, citing a Forrester Research prediction that 84 percent of residents in Western Europe will be mobile users by 2014. Jan Lundequist, a senior business leader at MasterCard, said there are quite a few residential card readers in use in Europe and Scandinavia, but he said MasterCard was repeatedly asked about a mobile phone version.

“What we heard from our customers [about the home-based card readers] is, ‘That’s all well and fine. They are working well, and they are secure. But there’s also the opportunity to use another personal infrastructure out there: the mobile phone.'”

Lundequist said the mobile CAP systems are “not replacing but complementing” the home-based reader devices. “For E-Commerce, it is all relying on that secure code,” he said.


2 Comments | Read MasterCard Goes Mobile With Chip-And-PIN Displays

  1. Tom Mahoney Says:

    Just what we all need, another big security hole for the bad guys to get into.

  2. Mike Lyons Says:

    I concur Mr. Mahoney. Any safeguards in place to prevent money laundering through virtual bank accounts and unlicensed money remitters?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.