MasterCard Tiptoeing Out Of The PCI Shadows

Written by Evan Schuman
October 17th, 2007

When it comes to Payment Card Industry (PCI) issues, it’s been Visa that has taken center stage. Heck, most of the other card players don’t even want to be seen peeking from the wings.

To be certain, MasterCard, AmericanExpress and others have been active in PCI circles, but they’re been quite willing to let Visa take all of the public heartaches.

Is that now changing, albeit a little bit? When the National Retail Federation came out, asking that retailers no longer be required to retain credit card data after authorization, it was MasterCard—not Visa—that issued a statement and a stinging statement it was, saying the NRF plan was "inaccurate and unjustified."

MasterCard was technically correct in denying that it requires retailers to retain that data. Sure, they can delete it and risk being unable to defend against chargebacks, but that’s their decision, MasterCard said. "A merchant may choose to store no cardholder data at all based on their own risk assessments and individual approaches to managing data storage according to their own business needs," read the statement.

That’s true, but as a practical matter, retailers have no practical alternative and MasterCard knows it. MasterCard also said that the card’s account number "may be stored in a truncated format which minimizes risk." That’s more fair, but it doesn’t eliminate the risk, nor reduce it as much as the NRF proposal. You’ll note how, in the full MasterCard statement, MasterCard never actually addresses the NRF proposal directly, in the sense of "What is the problem with their proposal?"

MasterCard this week also rolled out its PCI Merchant Education Program, which the card firm described as offering "complimentary education and training for acquiring banks and merchants to better their understanding of PCI DSS through interactive sessions. Eight Web-based modules featuring actionable advice from MasterCard and industry experts are now available online at"

That training program offers three approaches: on-site; live web meeting; and pre-recorded content offered online.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.