New Digital-Receipt Standard Envisions Cross-Channel and Even Cross-Chain Uses

Written by Evan Schuman
June 30th, 2011

A new digital-receipt standard released this week was designed to address retail complaints about an earlier version, with the new standard offering a single unified XML interface so that all data would be accessible and not have to be repeated. Version 2 comes from the National Retail Federation’s Association for Retail Technology Standards (ARTS) Council.

“Consideration was given to the possibility of providing separate XML interfaces. However, it was decided to provide a common XML interface embracing the requirements of all of the applications, because this was consistent with the historically common practice of integrating applications through POS transaction log files,” the new standard said. “It is noted that audit, security, labor productivity and activity analysis applications are very demanding of detail content, [with] all driving the need for an all-encompassing XML schema.”

Although there are many variations, the three basic forms of digital receipts are:

  • Receipts from an online purchase, which today are typically E-mailed.
  • An M-Commerce purchase.
  • A receipt from an in-person purchase, such as from an Apple store.

    The digital receipts will theoretically provide much stronger security, because it will be much easier to easily integrate with existing POS systems. There would be little point in fabricating a digital receipt, because the information referenced in the receipt’s barcode would need to precisely match what the POS records show, said Birame Sock, the chair of the ARTS working group that produced the digital-receipt standard, who is also CEO of a vendor called Third Solutions.

    Sock said she expects the standard to be impacting most retailers in about two years, which is how long she said she expects many POS vendors to fully implement the standard in future products.

    This level of integration is intended to avoid problems like Wal-Mart recently experienced with its gift-receipt program. (What’s a bad day? A lot of customers asking for their money back. What’s a really bad day? A small number of federal politicians asking for an FTC investigation.) Ironically, Wal-Mart already had the type of system the ARTS standard is advocating, but the chain said poor employee training meant associates didn’t know how to access it. Hello, federal investigation.

    Beyond keeping transactions and returns organized and trackable, the standard also anticipates merged-channel efforts, with lots of integrated and automated cross-marketing. “Indeed, one benefit of the Digital Receipt is its potential for channel integration: a common Digital Receipt can be provided in all channels, and a receipt from one channel can include links and promotions for all others,” the standard said.

    The standard also pointed out areas the group chose to sidestep. “Secure infrastructures, supporting authentication and non-repudiation are beyond the scope of this specification but will be required to fully support proof-of-purchase and payment dispute resolution applications,” the standard document said.

    The group also looked at CRM and other marketing issues, with an eye on the near-term future. The standard should “allow issuers to review customer purchase history and communicate with them through E-mail. Mass mailings can become target E-mail lists based on previous customer purchases and personal information. Forms for rebates, warranties and registrations often mailed separately with associated handling costs can be sent as attachments,” the document said. “The Digital-Receipt document will be sent to a storage facility for later data mining in search of marketing and merchandising trends. The intent for this research is to be cross-merchant, so specific merchant storage models are not an issue.”

    Cross-merchant? The vision here seems to anticipate silos where data from retail rivals can be collected and somehow shared—possibly in aggregate, possibly not. Unless the future looks a lot different than the present, somehow, that sounds like it may not go over that well. At the very least, it won’t go over easily or quietly.

  • advertisement

    3 Comments | Read New Digital-Receipt Standard Envisions Cross-Channel and Even Cross-Chain Uses

    1. David Dorf Says:

      We use the ARTS Digital Receipt standard in the Oracle POS to export receipts to third-parties. Our first implementation was with Intuit QuickReceipts, but they closed shop. Fortunately, there are other vendors available like Third Solutions.

    2. TotalTab Says:

      We are building a restaurant chain XML standard. I have the domain name reserved and will be putting up information in the coming weeks, probably in the August timeframe, at

    3. hobbie1 Says:

      One needs to ask why Intuit failed –
      1. Did they ever define what their business model was?
      2. What was the benefit and who were the targeted recipients – Consumer / Retailer or both?
      3. What was the business model?

      It appears that pooling receipt detail across multiple retailers and customer touch points does not provide value to the retailer. The multi-channel multi- retailer approach appears to be of little benefit to the retailer who ironically will most likely fund this service. Perhaps an approach like AIR MILES in Canada tied to a digital portal would make sense.


    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.