advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

New EU Rule To Likely Force U.S. Retailers To Disclose U.S. Data Breaches Immediately

June 23rd, 2011

For U.S. retailers, the situation is even stranger. In practical terms, any European customers will have to be notified immediately if there’s any breach that might affect them, even if the group is tiny. That notification won’t remain quiet for long—news reports will bounce the word back to the U.S. Then retailers will have a much larger task notifying U.S. customers of the breach.

Never mind what U.S. data-breach standards are—whichever country has the tightest standards will rule the situation. (That has actually been formalized in India’s new data-breach rules, but it’s a de facto result of how the European law will work.)

In fact, the smaller a U.S. retailer’s footprint in Europe, the more troublesome a problem this is likely to be. It’s bad enough for a retailer like Gap, which now uses an outside vendor called FiftyOne to do order-taking and shipping in dozens of countries. That arm’s length transaction almost certainly won’t be enough to shield Gap from the new EU requirements, but at least Gap will know it has customers in Europe.

Although companies like FiftyOne handle local currencies, tariffs and logistics, they’re not in a position to be in the center of a data breach for their retailer clients. Gap will still have to stay on top of European law and do the notifications.

But consider the situation of a retailer that has no official E-Commerce presence in the Euro zone. Customers can see the Web site, but no orders are officially accepted there. What happens when a third-party parcel-forwarding service such as Bongo or BayRu takes orders from Euro-zone customers and gives the retailer a U.S. address? The retailer doesn’t even know it has European customers.

If there’s a breach, and European customer payment-card data is stolen, the retailer may manage to dodge legal penalties for not immediately notifying European customers—after all, the retailer really didn’t know those customers were in Europe. But that will likely happen only after bureaucratic hassles and bad publicity.

(There’s an even worse scenario: one where the first indication a retailer gets of a data breach is when a European customer’s stolen card data leads back to the retailer that didn’t know it had any European customers. You can’t get farther behind the curve than that.)

Short of lobbying for international agreements that provide a little protection (or a lot more consistency), U.S. retailers may be stuck. In this game, whoever has the toughest rules wins.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.