advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

New Indian Privacy Rules Could Force The Hand Of Many U.S. Retailers

June 23rd, 2011

The new rules, like many European and Asian data privacy laws, require any entity that “collects, receives, possesses, stores, deals or handles” personal information to create and provide to the data subjects a privacy policy that clearly sets out its practices and policies on the use of that information and how the subjects’ privacy will be protected. The policy must identify any “sensitive personal data” collected or processed, explain the purposes for which the data is collected and used, and provide “reasonable” security practices and procedures.

The new regulations also effectively recommend the rather stringent ISO 27001 information security standard, as long as compliance with that standard (or an approved industry code of practice) is certified or audited annually.

But several things set the Indian law apart from most European laws, which may impact a retailer’s decision about whether to outsource data processing to an Indian company. These include:

  • The ISO standards
  • Although Indian law does not technically require companies that collect, store or process personal data to comply with the ISO 27001 security standard, it is the only standard expressly mentioned as being acceptable. It is perhaps the most comprehensive standard for data security in the general commercial world, and it provides detailed procedures for all aspects of data security. Most data privacy laws simply say things like “provide reasonable security considering the size and complexity of the organization and the sensitivity of the information collected.” The new Indian rules seem to go much further.

  • Express written consent
  • Indian law now requires both companies that collect and companies that store or process certain personal information to obtain express written consent from the data subject—the customer—for such collection and processing. It is not clear whether a simple warning banner or click-through agreement will meet this standard.

    The statute provides that collectors and processors “shall obtain consent in writing through letter or fax or E-mail from the provider of the sensitive personal data or information regarding purpose of usage before collection of such information.” Sensitive personal information is defined as including things like passwords, bank account and credit-card numbers, medical records, records of sexual orientation and biometric data.

  • Withdrawal of consent
  • Customers have the right to withdraw consent for both the use and the processing of their sensitive personal information at any time. As a consequence, both the data collector and all of its processors must have mechanisms in place to purge sensitive personal information from their systems, to track requests for removal of information and to validate that removal from not only all of their systems but their business associates’ systems.

  • Consent for re-processing
  • With some limits, consumers also have to consent to any third-party access to their sensitive personal information.

  • Contact information
  • If information is shared by the retailer or its agents (including sharing to the agents), customers must be given contact information about every party who has access to their information.

    This is a huge deal.


    advertisement

    One Comment | Read New Indian Privacy Rules Could Force The Hand Of Many U.S. Retailers

    1. srishtiaishwarya Says:

      Really nice write up, however, don’t you think keeping in mind the EU Law on data protection, Indian law is meant to facilitate outsourcing business. EU directives on data protection does not allow an EU country to transfer daa to a country that does not follow adequate data protection measures. The new law it seems is bound to encourage clients from EU to outsource their work to India. Moreover, even US is introducing a new data protection law this year in July that too is supposed to enforce stringent data protection measures.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.