New Macy’s Breach Among 2008’s List, Which Is Already Larger Than 2007

Written by Evan Schuman
September 3rd, 2008

The number of data breaches reported as of Aug. 22 of this year has already surpassed the total number in all of 2007, including a new one from Macy’s impacting some 4,100 customers.

With four months still remaining until the end of the year, the 449 breaches reported in the Identity Theft Resource Center’s list for 2008 exceeds 2007’s total of 446.

The Macy’s incident was sparked by "a massive security breach at a Visa processing center in England," said the Identity Theft Resource Center report. The 4,100 customers who owned a Macy’s Visa credit card were notified by the retailer after "thieves got hold of Visa account numbers and started making unauthorized charges, mainly at gas stations," the report said.

The report listed breaches in five categories—business, financial/credit, educational, governmental/military and healthcare. Businesses have registered the most breaches so far this year, reporting 167 intrusions, or 37 percent of the total, according to the report. The report also said that businesses have compromised some 5.5 million records since the start of 2008.

The ITRC said the actual number of breaches is probably higher, due to underreporting and because some breaches that affected multiple businesses were listed as single events.

"It should be noted that the ITRC does not place an inordinate weight on the count of records exposed," the report stated. "While the ITRC breach list reflects compromised records of more than 22 million, in more than 40 percent of breach events, the number of records exposed is not reported or fully disclosed."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.