advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

One Attacker With A Single PC Can Now Bring Down A Whole Server Cluster. Got Any Unhappy Customers?

January 11th, 2012

But brute-force attacks can only get so big, and last year attackers started to get smarter. They began to go after online gambling sites with attacks that targeted routers instead of Web servers. Those attacks are harder and more costly to defend against—and relatively cheaper for an attacker to launch.

Brute-force attacks require hiring botnets. That’s expensive for attackers. But the more damage an attack can do with each packet, the more cost-effective it is. Really smart attacks—like this hash-table attack—give attackers a huge bang for their buck.

Those smart attacks are also appealing to serious attackers for other reasons. At this point, data-center defenders understand botnet attacks. They can buy appliances specifically designed to filter out the problem packets. Punching through that armor is even more expensive for the bad guys. Attacks that are smarter and more targeted, on the other hand, hit E-Commerce sites where their defenses aren’t.

And although there are limited ways of marshaling botnets for a mass attack, there may be an almost endless supply of vulnerabilities like the hash-table problem that can be exploited.

And for E-tailers, that’s a problem, because so much of their online application infrastructure is a black box provided by Microsoft, IBM, Oracle or some other application framework vendor. They assume it will work, and that the vendors have built the framework so it won’t fall over under attack.

As this hash-table problem shows, that’s just not always the case. This vulnerability has been around for years. It just didn’t seem to matter, because calculating enough of the right fake variable names to launch an attack was just too much trouble for most bad guys. There were easier ways of attacking. And because it was a low-probability threat, app-framework vendors didn’t give it a lot of thought.

Now they have to—and none of them can say for sure how many other low-probability risks they’ve been ignoring for years.

And that’s just the threat from criminals who are in it for the money. What’s much worse in some ways for E-tailers is the fact that really smart attacks make it possible for small groups of script kiddies to go after big targets. Even one disgruntled teenager can make a good run at a major chain.

That means instead of an arms race, network security teams may be facing the equivalent of DDoS guerrilla warfare. And instead of defense against big, infrequent attacks, the successful strategy will be quick action against an endless stream of newly discovered vulnerabilities.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.