PayPal’s New Autofill Program Has Real Potential With Mobile

Written by Evan Schuman
May 1st, 2013

EBay’s PayPal (NASDAQ:EBAY) Tuesday (April 30) started pushing its new online login system, called Log In With PayPal. The essence of the new program is pretty much “autofill,” in that it autopopulates the forms of any e-tail site that is part of the program. It also allows PayPal users to login in with their PayPal credentials—which is not new—a move that is intended to make it less necessary for shoppers to keep track of dozens of password/login combos for all of their favorite e-tail sites.

From the shoppers’ perspective, that single login is not that exciting, as most have been doing a very insecure replacement: using the same login/password for those dozens of sites. In effect, that’s what PayPal is doing. The security impact is that if there is a breach—at PayPal, at that shopper’s computer, elsewhere—that password can now be used to access all of those sites. At least that’s the hole until PayPal is contacted and the password is shut down or changed.

In effect, PayPal is taking that very insecure consumer tendency—single credentials for multiple sites—and formalizing it under PayPal. Granted, PayPal’s internal security is robust and well-thought-out, so from that sense, it’s certainly a large security improvement for those shoppers. But if there is a breach somewhere—and it could just as easily be a Trojan that finds its way onto the shopper’s phone or laptop, which bypasses all of the PayPal security—then the problem is the same. The thief can access every site that accepts PayPal. Put another way, it’s perfectly secure until it isn’t. And then it’s really not secure.

Of greater potential benefit, though, is PayPal’s mobile component. There are a very large number of low-cost programs today that will autopopulate user information (address, name, payment details, etc.) for desktops and laptops. But very few such programs today exist for mobile. PayPal’s ability to fill out the mobile forms may make a huge difference in purchase completion.

Although mobile devices are used extensively for shopping and searching, most of those transactions stop when the item is placed in a shopping cart. That transaction is often completed later on a laptop/desktop. Even Macy’s CFO has found those lower mobile conversion rates. That’s because typing so much information into such a small screen is unpleasant, and doing so in a public area (think subway, plane, waiting room) can be awkward. PayPal’s mobile autopopulate function could make a meaningful difference with mobile checkout.

On the down side, there’s data control. This will deliver to PayPal a huge amount of data, data that PayPal has said before it will share with retailers. That’s great news if that means sharing with your team. That’s horrible news if it means sharing with your rivals. The reality is that it means both.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.