PCI Compliance Plateaus, With Level 3s Still Dangerously Low

Written by Evan Schuman
February 25th, 2012

The latest PCI compliance stats—which were released by Visa on Friday (Feb. 24)—show almost no meaningful change from the prior report (released last September), with Level 1s holding at 98 percent, Level 2s holding at 91 percent, Level 3s growing slightly from 57 percent to 58 percent and Level 4s still secretly holding at “moderate.”

The Level 3 figures are somewhat interesting, in that Visa only started to report those figures as of last summer. Its first report put Level 3 compliance at 60 percent (as of June 30, 2011), which dropped three months later (September 30) to 57 percent. The latest December 31 figures show a slight recovery to 58 percent. Given that even 60 percent was disappointing for PCI compliance, Level 3s clearly need more work.

The 60 retailers using VisaNet Processor (Direct Connection) saw that group’s compliance drop slightly, from 100 percent to 98 percent, while its population size dropped trivially from 61 (as of September 30, 2011) to 60 (as of December 31, 2011).

Agent (Downstream) compliance sharply increased during the identical timeframe, from 83 percent to 93 percent, as its population size grew from 1,262 to 1,367. Increasing in compliance sharply at the same time as the population grows more than 8 percent is a double PCI win.

The Level 1 population dropped ever so slightly—from 407 in September to 404 in December—and the Level 2 population grew by six merchants—from 1,060 to 1,066. Level 3s also improved their compliance—albeit slightly—while the population increased by exactly 100 merchants, from 3,049 to 3,149. Level 4 population numbers do not appear to be meaningful; Visa consistently reports the figure as “~5,000,” with no indication of how much wiggle room ~ gives.

Level 1 chains process more than six million Visa transactions a year, Level 2s process from one to six million and Level 4s process fewer than one million such transactions, while Level 3s handle 20,000 to one million online Visa transactions a year.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.