PCI Security Council Promoting Visa Rule As Its Own

Written by Evan Schuman
November 9th, 2007

In a move that is likely to impact retail software vendors a lot more than retail IT people themselves, the PCI Security Council this week said it a key Visa security procedure and making it PCI mandatory for all retailers.

The core reason the promotion of Visa’s Payment Application Best Practices (PABP) to the council’s Payment Application Data Security Standard (PA DSS) won’t have much retail IT impact is that most retailers accept Visa, which means they have likely been following this procedure for years.

But this allows—and indeed forces—vendors creating applications for retailers to precisely comply with this standard or else will soon be unable to sell to those retailers.

In retail security today, "the applications are the weakest link in the chain," said Bob Russo, general manager, PCI Security Standards Council. By requiring vendors to comply, Russo said, he expects this to quickly isolate the few that resist the change.

As a software vendor trying to sell to retail, "you’re really going to be conspicuous by your absence," Russo said.

Dave Taylor, the president of the independent PCI Vendor Alliance, agreed with Russo. "This announcement amounts to the promotion of PABP from a single card brand’s best practice to an industry standard, which should greatly increase both awareness and compliance by vendors that process card data," Taylor said.

He added that the vendor persuasion is most critical. "It will also cause more merchants to insist that their payment processing hardware, software and service providers are compliant because PA DSS will get much more industry visibility and this will further drive both enforcement and compliance," Taylor said.

Asked why it would that much of a difference given that most of the industry is already doing it, Taylor said it’s the distinction between using it as a matter of choice and having it made mandatory.

"There’s not the strong demand for PABP compliance and certification among users today," Taylor said. "I expect that PA DSS will really amp that demand up over the next 1-2 years."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.