Pennsylvania Making Cloud Use Taxable, Maybe, Sometimes, Depending On Where The Server Is

Written by Frank Hayes and Evan Schuman
June 21st, 2012

Just when you thought cloud computing couldn’t get any more complicated and fraught with hidden gotchas, the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue has jumped in to sprinkle taxation magic on your cloud business cases. What the Keystone State did—and other states are likely to follow—doesn’t make cloud any less profitable, but the specifics of the cloud deployment could now impact tax costs.

A Dallas tax services firm—called simply Ryan—first noted the state’s letter from May 31. That letter ruled cloud operations are fully taxable, assuming the end user is in Pennsylvania. “The ruling represents a marked departure from the department’s earlier treatment of cloud computing. Prior department guidance advised that access to software solely through the Internet was not a taxable transaction, as long as the server did not reside in Pennsylvania,” said a statement issued by Ryan.

For example, let’s say Sears buys some SAP suite and installs it in a public or private cloud, and then employees in Pennsylvania Sears stores use the software. Under the new ruling, Sears has to pay sales/use tax on the purchase (including, apparently, purchase of maintenance contracts, which provide additional software) as if it were purchased in Pennsylvania, prorated to the number of employees it has in that state.

Alternatively, let’s say Target offers a consumer charge service and happens to handle some of the service on the cloud. If some Target customers in Pennsylvania use this site and pay for the service, even if Target had no stores or other facilities in Pennsylvania, this letter appears to say Target would have to collect sales/use tax on that sale—a ruling that certainly seems to conflict with the nexus element in the Quill decision.

What if only part of the transactions happen on the cloud server? How’s this scenario for an accounting nightmare: What if cloud servers—along with physical servers—are in a round-robin? Some of the cloud servers are in Pennsylvania, but many aren’t. How can the chain possibly determine which server locations handled particular transactions?

What if employees in Illinois are generating revenue and they happen to use a VPN, which routes through the cloud in Pennsylvania? Does that place all that revenue under Pennsylvania jurisdiction? And just wait until other states try and mimic Pennsylvania’s move.

Here’s how the state rationalized its decision: “In light of recent case law and technological advances, the department concludes that because computer software is tangible personal property, the charge for electronically accessing taxable software is taxable. In accessing taxable software the user is exercising a license to use the software, as well as control or power over the software, at the user’s location.”

The state gave some exceptions, for those who found the letter insufficiently confusing: “The sale and use of software that otherwise would be subject to tax is not subject to sales tax if the end user of the software is located outside of the Commonwealth, even if the cloud server that hosts the software is located in Pennsylvania. However, if the end user is located in Pennsylvania, tax is due regardless of the location of the seller or server. Finally, the resale exemption may be claimed on the purchase of software to be located in Pennsylvania when tax will be collected on the use of the software in Pennsylvania.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.