Report: Pay By Touch In Bankruptcy Proceeding

Written by Evan Schuman
November 16th, 2007

Onetime retail biometric leader Pay By Touch is involved in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection proceeding, after four of its employees filed an involuntary petition in Los Angeles, according to a report in the influential payments newsletter, the Nilson Report.

"Pay By Touch has 20 days to respond to the petition once it is officially served on the company and it can choose to oppose, accept, or make an alternative suggestion to resolve the petition. The company is in the process of retaining bank¬ruptcy counsel. It is also seeking financing to cover its cash flow needs including past, present, and future payroll obligations," the report said. "In an internal com¬munication, Pay By Touch’s general counsel informed employees that claims for wages, salary, and reimburse¬ment are not capped by the bankruptcy statute or the filing of the petition and that the company will continue working to pay salaries as and when it can."

The Nilson Report also reported that John Rogers, a founder of PayByTouch and the "owner of 64 percent of the company’s stock, has filed for personal bankruptcy. Pay By Touch has raised $190 million in three rounds of funding since 2005."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.