advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Researchers: Thieves Can Read A Mobile Phone From 14 Feet Away

November 9th, 2011

And for customers, there’s not much retailers can do. Many customers are oblivious to what’s going on around them—that’s why they dictate payment-card numbers over their mobile phones in loud voices in public places. There’s no reason to believe they’ll be much more careful when it comes to PINs or passwords they’re keying into their phones, even with strangers within a few feet. From several yards away, they’ll likely feel completely secure—if they even notice anything.

But if you can’t save customers from themselves, there are still store associates, whose in-store mobile POS devices are typically from Apple (like the devices the Chapel Hill researchers spied on). IT can make security recommendations for associates. Reducing the brightness of the screen would “have a detrimental effect on any reconstruction,” according to the researchers—in other words, it would chop down the distance a thief could be able to surreptitiously record from. That would also make conventional shoulder surfing more difficult.

Disabling the visual keypress confirmation—the pop-up letters that appear while typing—would make this attack completely unusable, according to the researchers. Both the size and the position of the pop-up letters and numbers are critical to capturing typing at a distance. Trouble is, without them, the device itself might be unusable for many associates.

Of course, the best defense would be to train associates to guard their screens carefully while they’re keying in anything sensitive, including PINs, passwords and payment-card numbers. In practice, that may be impossible. Part of the reason for using Apple devices is that it keeps the need for in-person training to a minimum. Reminding associates via E-mail that they should guard their screens isn’t likely to be any more useful that telling them to report a missing device immediately.

And although it would be nice to think that alerting store managers to the risk would work, that would depend very heavily on how security-conscious the manager is. From observations in the field, that’s not promising. We recently were in a Starbucks when an associate called all the way across the store to a manager that he needed her password to correct a transaction. In response, she carefully dictated the password in a loud, clear voice that every customer in the place could hear.

Maybe just locking down the screen brightness is the most practical way to go after all.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.