RuBee Protocol Faring Well, But Not In Retail

Written by Evan Schuman
February 15th, 2007

As the IEEE prepares next week to start focusing on the RuBee standard, the metal-and-water-penetrating RFID alternative is faring well with government and medical trials, said the executive primarily responsible for its launch.

Ironically, when RuBee first started getting attention about seven months ago, it was partly because of strong support from leading global retailers, including the U.S.’s Best Buy, U.K.-based Tesco, Germany’s Metro Group and France’s Carrefour. That’s ironic because retail is the area where RuBee has simply not gotten any traction, said John Stevens, CEO of Visible Assets and also the chairman of the working group handling RuBee, known in IEEE circles as IEEE 1902.1.

Stevens said his company is working with the U.S. Department of Energy with cellphone tracking in secure areas at about 25 separate installations, some travel companies, medical/pharmaceuticals and other areas, but that they are no longer actively working on any retail projects with RuBee.

Stevens, the man most closely associated with creating and launching RuBee, said there are a few reasons for the drying up of retail projects, but mostly it’s a matter of focusing on areas that are more financially attractive right away.

“Retail is such a low margin, high-volume business, there’s so much risk associated with it,” he said. “Wal-Mart has created an environment that has eliminated all capital for RFID.”

That has, Stevens said, colored the counsel his investors are giving. “It’s had to get anybody to get capital” for a retail push, he said. “None of our investors are doing anything to encourage us to be aggressive in retail. We’ve got so many things where we can make money right now.”

Pete Abell, a former IDC RFID analyst who now runs his own consulting firm called Kaleidoscope Technology Strategy (Amherst, NH), said RuBee’s business strategy is sound.

“RuBee is waiting for more large players and concentrating on areas where it makes good business sense” Abell said. “Getting into a commodity effort at this stage makes no business sense for them.”

The only one of the initial retail backers that Stevens has on an active pursue list is BestBuy?which seemed to have some interest in a batteryless application with RuBee?but he said there are currently no active discussions.

Part of that is also the nature of RuBee, which does not lend itself to the high-speed nature of an assembly line or the rapid conveyor belts of a large distribution center. It’s primary advantage is its ability to not be blocked by liquids and metals.

That’s much of the rationale of the Dept. of Energy projects, Stevens said, because the RuBee chip in the cellphone runs into less interference than would RFID. “They have tried RFID (but)it hasn’t been reliable because bodies, which are (primarily) water, block the signal,” he said.


One Comment | Read RuBee Protocol Faring Well, But Not In Retail

  1. Richard Lucas Says:

    Readers of the auto ID mailing list I moderate will know that there are many who believe that item level RFID coding will not be a feature at retail unless and until the cost is a low as ink on paper.

    10 boxes of matches cost 1 zloty in Poland, each has a bar code, the value of the item being sold is 3 cents. Who is going to increase the cost of that item by RFID? Who is going to pay for a cash register reading system that only deals with higher value items.

    Big companies want new technologies to be cheaper.

    Before anyone gets too optimistic about retail RFID at the check out, consider the advantages of machine vision, which simply recognises what things are from looking at them. with no extra coding.. We aren’t there yet, but as with biometrics, it is adding value without adding cost (we all come with a retina, and a finger)
    RFID is going to be huge in coding high value items,
    and if low value items are not coded does anyone want a “dual system” reading both?

    Don’t think hard nosed Tesco shareholders are going to pay for both in their new stores, except when giving their wealthy clients a better deal than Walmart selling premium products.
    Richard Lucas


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.