advertisement
advertisement

Scanner Grabs Identity Data from Driver’s License

Written by Evan Schuman
October 27th, 2005

A high roller walks into the casino, ever so mindful of the constant surveillance cameras. Wanting to avoid sales pitches and other unwanted attention, he pays cash at each table and anonymously moves around frequently to discourage people who are trying to track his movements.

After a few hours of losses, he goes to the cashier and asks for a cash advance off of his credit card. The card tells the casino his name, but not much else. As is required by card issuers, the cashier asks for some other identification, such as a driver’s license.

That license offers the casino a ton of CRM identification goodies, but the cashier is only supposed to glance at the picture and the name to verify identity and hand the license?and its info treasure trove?back to the gambler.

Not any more, at least if a Minneapolis company called Cash Systems Inc. has anything to say about it. The firm was recently awarded a U.S. patent for a device that can grab all of the data of almost any U.S. driver’s license in seconds and instantly dump it into a casino’s CRM system.

“The casinos spend millions of dollars in player-tracking cards so they know who their top players are in the casino,” said Chris Larson, Cash Systems’ COO. “The people taking out cash don’t want to be tracked, don’t want to be given promotions. They’re not there for free buffets or anything like that.”

The data to be initially captured includes name, address and the amount of money withdrawn and data to be initially excluded will be age and driver’s license number. The new high-security licenses that states are starting to adopt could have far more information in them.

Larson, whose company has sold these systems to about 160 casinos in the U.S., painted the change as a convenience for gamblers who might not want to wait in line for a loyalty card.

Katherine Albrecht, a well-known privacy advocate whose new book Spychips details privacy issues surrounding RFID, said the ability to identify gamblers merged with the casinos’ tracking systems could be a bad combo.

“If casinos could find a way to force you to I.D. yourself, they could keep people out. The problem for the rest of us is that’s not all they plan to do with the information,” she said. “They can use that information to follow individual gaming patterns over time. If they know you’re the type of person who drinks when you gamble, they could have a waitress come by with free drinks. Or if you’re the type of person who plays Blackjack and wins but loses at Craps, they’d know that.”

Larson, whose company does not yet have casinos using this system in Las Vegas or Atlantic City, said that he believes this system would be of strong value to a large chain such as Harrah’s because “we think there is a lot of data that they don’t have an awareness of.”

Tim Stanley, the CIO for $10 billion casino empire Harrah’s Entertainment, disagrees.

“Fully 80 percent of our revenues are tracked,” Stanley said. “These individuals generally do need and want to be known.”

In Stanley’s experience, he said, most customers will simply play on casino credit rather than go for credit card advances requiring driver’s licenses.

But what about the customer who truly want to remain hidden? The Harrah’s CIO said he didn’t see that being a sufficiently large group to care about.

“If somebody is trying that hard to be anonymous,” Stanley said, his voice trailing. “I just think they’re chasing a pretty small number of people.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.