Secret Service/FBI Reports “A Considerable Spike In Cyber Attacks” Against E-Tailers

Written by Evan Schuman
February 13th, 2009

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI ) and the Secret Service issued an unusually specific joint statement on Thursday (Feb. 12) warning E-tailers of “a considerable spike in cyber attacks” against them and detailing the cyber thieves’ modus operandi and some suggested preventative tactics.

The statement said the “attacker methodology” was to identify sites that seem vulnerable to SQL injection and that the attackers “appear to target MSSQL only.” (How nice. The cyber thieves run Microsoft-only shops. Redmond would be proud.)

The bad guys, according to the FBI and Secret Service statement, then typically “use xp_cmdshell, an extended procedure installed by default on MSSQL, to download their hacker tools to the compromised MSSQL server” before getting “valid Windows credentials by using fgdump or a similar tool.” The next step is to install a traditional network sniffer as well as “install backdoors that beacon periodically to their command and control servers, allowing surreptitious access to the compromised networks.”

The most common targets are databases, hardware security modules and processing applications “in an effort to obtain credit card data or brute-force ATM PINs. They use WinRAR to compress the information they pilfer from the compromised networks.”

The remainder of the joint statement focused on reminding retailers of standard security procedures, such as “implement firewall rules to block known malicious IP addresses,” “deny access to the Internet except through proxies for Store and Enterprise servers and workstations” and “run the minimum required applications and services on servers necessary to perform their intended function.”

It also specified escape sequence phrasing changes that both the FBI and Secret Service are encouraging E-tailers to make right away.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.