advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Should Wal-Mart Digital Signage Use Near-Time News, Weather, POS Data?

May 18th, 2010

This kind of ideal customized localization (or should it be localized customization?) with digital signage can work quite well with real-time or near-time information, but it might work even better with reminders, said Hiatt, who today runs Dynamic Retailing LLC. “The more compelling idea is being able to remind people of what’s coming up. People actually buy a lot more beer if the forecast suggests the weekend will be nice and sunny,” he said. “It doesn’t end up mattering what happens over the weekend. It could be raining.”

In other words, forecast accuracy might become irrelevant, at least in terms of digital signage strategy. Hyping the prediction could push sales, always leaving the opportunity to push more this weekend if, by some miracle, the forecast is correct. And if it isn’t, the message can be changed with a few keystrokes.

Digital signage can also be used effectively for regional events or holidays that might be seen as meriting national marketing attention. “Not everyone cares about Three Kings Day,” Hiatt said.

The POS data near-time recommendations are certainly doable, he said, but the challenge there is the analysis load. Typically, POS data is zapped to corporate for chain-wide analysis, with an eye on regional differences. A store-specific approach would require that the data be sent to corporate and that a store-only copy be saved—and an analytics engine used—locally. That approach can be done, but it might require more effort than it’s worth for a general manager, who could get much of that information from talking with cashiers and walking the aisles.

Theoretically, the most effective use of digital signage is not keyed into the chain, the regional or even the store but to individual shoppers. However, such CRM-based approaches—whether directly through an RFID tagged loyalty card or alternatively using wireless smartcarts or shopping assistance devices that are associated with the loyalty card—are expensive and difficult to get to work properly.

Technically, a smartcart might have less of an ROI benefit because the cart itself could already broadcast its own ads to that identified consumer. And the customer would be shown that ad continuously, regardless of where—or how fast—she pushed that cart. A complimentary, coordinated ad effort—with the cart and the aisle-based signage working together to reinforce messages—might be powerful, but it’s probably too complicated and expensive to be practical in the near term.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.