Show-Me State Shows Nation’s 45th Data Breach Law

Written by Fred J. Aun
August 24th, 2009

Adding to America’s crazy quilt scenario of similar-but-different state laws and regulations facing retailers,a new data breach notification law goes into effect in Missouri Friday (Aug. 28). There are now 45 states with such measures, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The Missouri law is similar to most other state laws dealing with data breach notifications, but it includes medical and health information, data the states usually don’t mention because it is protected by the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

With the new Missouri law, those in the state who “own or license personal information” of Missouri residents “or any person that conducts business in Missouri that owns or licenses personal information in any form of a resident of Missouri” will be required to notify affected consumers when security breaches are discovered, according to the law. It defines a breach as “unauthorized access to and unauthorized acquisition of personal information maintained in computerized form by a person that compromises the security, confidentiality or integrity of the personal information.”

However, the law stresses that notification is not required if, “after an appropriate investigation” or consultation with the law enforcement agencies, it is determined that a risk of identity theft or other fraud to consumers is unlikely to occur due to the breach. The law gives the state attorney general authority to sue violators of the law and seek fines of up to $150,000 per breach “or series of breaches of a similar nature that are discovered in a single investigation.”

Missouri stipulates that personal information includes a person’s first name or first initial and last name “in combination with” unprotected (through encryption, redaction or other means) elements such as a Social Security number, a driver’s license number or other unique identification number created or collected by a government body; a financial account number, credit card number or debit card number or unique electronic identifier or routing codes (in combination with any required security codes, access codes or passwords). Unlike some other states, Missouri also includes medical or health insurance information in that list.

The law calls for disclosure of data breaches “without unreasonable delay” but, as in the case of a proposed federal security breach law, it doesn’t define “unreasonable.” The law says consumer notification must be “consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement” and with any efforts needed to determine “sufficient contact information,” the scope of the breach and to “restore the reasonable integrity, security, and confidentiality of the data system.”

So what, exactly, will retailers have to disclose to consumers when a breach is discovered? In addition to a general description of the incident, the merchant will be required to reveal the type of personal information obtained by the culprits, provide a telephone number for consumers seeking more information “if one exists,” give out the contact information for consumer reporting agencies and provide the potential victims with “advice that directs the affected consumer to remain vigilant by reviewing account statements and monitoring free credit reports.”

Steve DelBianco, executive director of NetChoice, an Internet lobbying group, said that “the industry has worked hard to make these state laws as consistent and similar as it can to avoid a patchwork situation. For the most part, we’ve been able to do that.”

Nevertheless, differences remain. For example, Illinois doesn’t permit companies to delay issuing data breach notices while they work with law enforcement, DelBianco said.

He added that most national and multi-state retailers don’t alter their notification plans on a state-by-state basis. “For the most part, a retailer will follow the notice requirements of their home state or the state where they have the most customers,” he said.


One Comment | Read Show-Me State Shows Nation’s 45th Data Breach Law

  1. Lee Says:

    RE: the inclusion of health information – that is not necessarily duplicative of HIPAA – HIPAA applies to ‘covered entities’ and ‘business associates’. They will certainly have the bulk of protected health information, but it sounds like the state law would apply even to those who aren’t already under HIPAA.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.