Square Reverses Course, Now Embraces Encryption

Written by Evan Schuman
April 27th, 2011

Square, the well-funded startup that found itself on the winning end of a pissing context with VeriFone last month, because it refused to encrypt mobile payment transactions, has now reversed course and embraced such encryption. It switched course on Wednesday (April 27), which by remarkable coincidence is the same day it announced that encryption aficionado Visa had made an unspecified investment in Square.

Sam Quigley, a Square manager with the title Security Lead, casually responded to a question at a Visa conference that Square will be distributing—for free, mind you—an encrypting card reader this summer for its mobile-phone-payment users. This is an amusing turn of events. Last month, VeriFone was deluged with no shortage of bad blood for having demanded that Square either encrypt transactions or risk destroying the solar system. Square said no such system was necessary. I guess a month—and Visa dollars—has a way of changing one’s perspective. And, I guess VeriFone ended up winning this battle, in that Square did what it asked the company to do. But it wasn’t what VeriFone wanted Square to do. VeriFone didn’t want the victory; it wanted the battle. By embracing encryption, VeriFone’s fears have become quite real.


One Comment | Read Square Reverses Course, Now Embraces Encryption

  1. Matt Putman Says:

    Hi There

    I have been following this issue quite closely, and from my understanding PCI standards council has withdrawn any original specifications for mobile PCI standards and are currently evaluating the market.From the research I have done I have read that a business can be fined up to $25 000 a month for not being PCI compliant. My question is how is Square operating in this environment without being compliant or if they are compliant how have they acheived this compliance if there is no Mobile standard? My second question is, is Square acting as an Acquirer in the merchant supply chain? Look forward to your response


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.