Starbucks Finds A CRM Reason To Postal Mail Giftcards

Written by Evan Schuman
March 22nd, 2012

With today’s overwhelming focus on digital goods, why on Earth would a chain choose to physically send giftcards through the mail anymore? Answer: It’s arguably the last reliable—and consistently legal—way to get customer addresses.

Ironically, it’s Starbucks—which was one of the first to try mobile payment and intrinsically understood the social media concept years before Facebook launched—that has embraced sending giftcards (for customer birthdays, which is another clever CRM touch) through the rain/sleet/dark-of-night people.

This issue actually combines two marketing devices popular throughout the 20th Century: snailmail and plastic giftcards/loyalty cards. (Retail Columnist Todd Michaud recently wondered when the plastic cards will go away and why they haven’t already.)

When compared with E-mailing an image of a coupon to be printed or—better yet—a barcode or QR code that places the digital coupon in a shopper’s phone, it’s almost impossible to justify the cost of printing plastic cards, paying for the labor to place them in envelopes, coughing up postage, and then waiting days for those cards to arrive. That’s true, unless there’s some really valuable data there.

Until recently, the go-to technique for getting such address information was to ask for ZIP codes at the POS. There are two problems with that. First, it is far too easy for customers to lie and give a far away ZIP code, assuming they opt to answer the question at all. Second, some courts have been ruling such efforts illegal.

The courts have been inconsistent, though. Williams-Sonoma, for example, went before two judges in two states and was told emphatically “no” by one and “yes” by the other. The “no” involved California state law and the “yes” involved New Jersey state law. The courts’ decisions were each based on wording differences within those state laws. But with 48 other states to go and lots more federal and state judges, few chains are willing to rely on ZIP code approaches.

What Starbucks did was to tell customers that it would give away free drinks to customers on their birthdays. All they’d have to do was bring in the birthday giftcard Starbucks was about to snailmail them. And it then reminded customers that they might want to go back and update their personal information. (To quote a favorite line from The Sting: “Give yourself a couple of seconds. You wouldn’t want to lie to me.”)

This is Starbucks’ CRM equivalent of a triple latte. One: it gives customers a concrete reason to give their correct address. (Once hooked on caffeine, there’s little a Starbucks fan won’t do for free Java Juice). Two: It provides an incentive to reveal a birthdate and year (although little reason to necessarily provide the correct one. Still, many will anyway). Three: The campaign requires the associated card be “active,” defined as being used within the prior year. That’s a nice incentive to get someone to go in and buy a full-priced coffee to get a free one.

The point of having a correct address is not necessarily to send that customer a lot of marketing collateral via snailmail. The weak ROI of printing and distributing such material will soon enough make that no longer practical. No, the intent is purely to better understand where your customers are coming from, so you can better target campaigns.

Let’s say a Starbucks in Florida is seeing a lot of requests for a particular drink that it has never seen much activity with. Are the local tastes in Florida changing? Or is this because a nearby business is working with a California company and those purchases are from California workers being flown in for meetings?

Web activity is another area where geography is challenging, especially for customers who travel a lot. Even mobile won’t fully resolve this issue. Sure, its geolocation capabilities can tell you where that customer is at that moment—for that matter, so can a Web visitor’s IP address, with a few limitations.

But it’s often important to know where customers are based, where they are from. Without doing individual research, you really need to rely on customers’ giving up accurate information. As for that individual research idea, Amazon was accused of trying it and that didn’t turn out well.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.