Stealing From A Wal-Mart? Better Not Drive A Rental

Written by Evan Schuman
April 17th, 2012

A pair of accused Wal-Mart thieves in North Carolina learned a valuable lesson last week: If you’re going to shoplift from the world’s largest retailer, it’s not a great idea to drive to the heist in a rental car.

It seems that as they exited the Havelock Wal-Mart with multiple yet-to-be-paid-for HP desktop computers, store officials did not stop them, but they did jot down their license plate number. Police found that it was from a car rental company, which happened to be able to remotely shut down the engine. And GPS was involved, too. Yep, this was a dual-shoplifter takedown, ultra-geek style.

The tale starts at 10:28 AM (New York time) on April 10 when Matthew Randall, 24, and Tommy Hairston, 32, walked into the Wal-Mart and placed HP desktops—with a combined pricetag of about $1,500—into shopping carts and simply pushed them through the front doors, according to Diane Miller, public information officer for the city of Havelock. Given Wal-Mart policy, no one in the store tried to stop them, although the license plate number was captured and relayed to the police.

The police quickly identified the car as a rental, and the rental company was able to remotely shut down the engine and then use the car’s GPS unit to tell police where the dead vehicle was.

The car was apparently shut down in front of the pair’s unit at a local hotel called The Hostess House. Police arrived and found Hairston and Randall staring at the car, which had its hood up, Miller said, adding that the two were apparently trying to figure out why the car wouldn’t start.

Police found other items in the car that they determined had been stolen from other retailers, Miller said.

Wal-Mart’s rules say an associate can’t stop a shoplifter from the leaving the store, but there is nothing about stopping them after they leave. North Carolina police are apparently very efficient. They apprehended the two men in front of the Hostess House at 11 AM, barely a half-hour after the pair left Wal-Mart. (By the way, the vehicle they had rented was a red Mitsubishi Montero SUV. So much for being inconspicuous.)


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.