Still No Apple Mobile Wallet, But A Card-Number Keychain That May Be Just A Bit Too Clever

Written by Frank Hayes
June 12th, 2013

Anyone who was expecting Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) to jump into in-store mobile payments this week is probably feeling…well, comfortably disappointed. The big keynote speech at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference contained, as usual, no sign of the “iWallet” that some Apple fans insist will be coming any day now. But there was something just a little bit like a mobile wallet, and that’s sure to keep the wishful thinking alive.

That something was the iCloud Keychain. Put simply, it’s a cloud-based feature of Apple’s new iPhone operating system, iOS 7, that lets users store passwords, logins and payment-card numbers for use with mobile commerce sites. Yes, it does all the things password managers do these days, including automatically filling in the forms that make online retail so much more miserable for customers on a phone than on a PC. But it’s adding card numbers that makes this interesting.

Apple didn’t spill many details about the new feature except to say that the card numbers will be delivered with 256-bit AES encryption (we’re guessing that means an encrypted connection, but Apple didn’t say), the numbers will only be sent to “trusted devices,” and the feature will suggest specific card numbers when an order form calls for them.

Now, Apple has been running a retail chain for more than a decade, and it understands PCI. It also understands that the PCI Council still hasn’t nailed down the requirements for mobile POS devices handling payment-card numbers. But that’s not Apple’s problem here. Apple users won’t need to use iCloud Keychain to order anything from Apple—Apple already has their credentials. It’s only other retailers that Apple will be serving up card numbers for.

So when the iCloud Keychain is being used, it won’t be in PCI scope for Apple, because Apple won’t be acting as a merchant—just a cloud storage provider and phone maker. For other chains, the customer’s phone is out of PCI scope too, just as a mag-stripe card would be when it’s sitting in a customer’s wallet.

This system is designed so that any security problems are always somebody else’s problem—and never in scope for PCI. It’s probably the cleverest PCI workaround ever by a retailer. And it will dodge PCI responsibility for what could become the largest cache of payment-card numbers outside the banks/processors/card brands system. Very clever, Apple.

Unless, of course, there’s a major breach of Apple’s iCloud that releases payment card numbers into the hands of cybercriminals. Does anyone think that cleverness will actually help Apple when Visa and MasterCard decide the distance between Apple’s left hand and its right isn’t so far after all?


One Comment | Read Still No Apple Mobile Wallet, But A Card-Number Keychain That May Be Just A Bit Too Clever

  1. David True Says:

    How about tokenization of the cloud-stored data. Would that help?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.