advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Target’s New Site: Where’s The New?

August 24th, 2011

That last problem is also troublesome, and it illustrates one of the biggest challenges Target faces. This is indeed an entirely new site, but it also has to jump into tens of millions of in-process transactions from the nation’s third-largest retailer.

The site, which launched about 1:30 AM New York time on Tuesday (Aug. 23), featured a Daily Deals countdown clock on the homepage. When it launched, the clock was working but the link just generated an error if someone clicked. On Wednesday, the link worked fine but the countdown clock stopped showing the days and times of its countdown.

The new launch seems to be relying heavily on security-by-obscurity, but the obscurity isn’t all that obscure. For example, shortly before the new site launched, Target displayed a page telling people the site was down and the new one was about to be launched. The source of that holding page displayed the URL for the staging site for the new Target.com, an area that remained un-password-protected almost two days after the launch.

A nice touch on the site is the Woof Page, which is an error page that says “Woof! We are suddenly extremely popular. You may not be able to access our site momentarily due to unusually high traffic. Please stay here and we’ll try to get you in as soon as we can.” The user doesn’t need to reload the page. When the site can handle another visitor, the page automatically refreshes itself and delivers the homepage.

Target’s McKoy said that feature is just part of the initial site’s growing pains.

Pressed for any example of customization that would set the new Target.com site apart from its key rivals, Target spokesperson Morgan O’Murray E-mailed: “One example is in the near future if you have a baby registry, the baby homepage customizes to show the right information for the correct age of the baby.”

There are two concerns with that example. First, that functionality has been widely used by Amazon and many other sites for quite a few years. It’s clearly not setting Target apart. Second, that’s not even part of the site launch; O’Murray said it was “in the near future.” Neither O’Murray nor McKoy could—or would—cite any specific thing the new site can do that illustrates Target’s stated push for personalization, improved security and streamlined cart and checkout.

McKoy also stressed the new site’s merged-channel capabilities but, there again, no specific examples were offered of anything the new site would enable customers to do in-store or on a mobile device that they can’t already do, either on Target.com or with other major retail sites. He ruled out price customization, but he wouldn’t specify what the site is doing.

When asked if the customization was based on cookie-tracking, session tracking, existing CRM history or history of customers starting with day one of the new site, McKoy said “it’s based on all of those interactions that we’ve had with guests.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.