The Data Dilemma: Productivity Vs. Protection

Written by Evan Schuman
February 8th, 2008

These days, retail’s data breach du jour is some manager’s laptop getting stolen.

It’s hardly even newsworthy any more, with among the more publicized victims being the HomeDepot, the Gap, Neiman Marcus, Starbucks, the IRS and the classic Veteran’s Administration theft.

Typically, the laptop’s data is either not encrypted or is encrypted behind a simple (most likely guessable) password. Alas, those fingerprint biometric authentication devices for laptops never seemed to catch on.

Like most IT problems, this issue avoids any easy answers. Today’s corporate office is being flooded with low-cost data transportation options, from laptops to PDAs to multi-GByte memory sticks and form factors inbetween. This is a good thing for productivity and convenience, making the lives of telecommuters and frequent travelers easier and productivity better.

When wireless with borderline broadband speeds get thrown in, the temptation to take advantage of this productivity potpourri is almost irresistible for knowledge workers on the road.

Speaking of travelers, Thursday’s Washington Post gave movable managers—especially those globally-oriented—more data threats to fear. The story spoke of airport security screeners seizing laptops—and PDAs and other data devices—for multi-day inspections and sometimes ordering the passenger to type in their password, exposing all confidential data. Sometimes, data was deleted.

The story speaks only about transportation from the U.S. to other countries, but there’s no reason that it couldn’t just as easily expand to domestic flights.

Both situations—laptops getting stolen and getting inspected by persons unknown—are quite troubling.

Breach letters are being sent out so frequently that I wonder if it’s going to pique the business interests of Hallmark. A card for every occasion, when you care enough to breach the very best. Perhaps a merger with their Get Well cards? "Sorry to hear that you’re not getting around much these days…. [open card] …. but your CVV sure as heck is. Call 1-800-DATA-OOPS for your free year of credit monitoring, courtesy of your neighborhood retail chain."

Or perhaps a birthday card morph? "Great News! I just heard it’s your birthday today …. [open card] …. Bad news! I heard about it while reading an Eastern European hacker listserve. Sorry about that. Here’s credit monitoring until your next birthday, courtesy of your local physician group."

But what are the technology options? It’s a tad bit insincere for retailers to express indignation at their mangers taking home confidential-data-laden laptops when they’re not aggressively enforcing any data policies. Truth be told, most senior execs like seeing workers being so efficient off-site and they tend to discount the probability of being hurt, until it happens.

The main options are to:

  • Ban confidential corporate data from leaving the office
  • Require that all confidential data must be accessed solely from the server, with nothing being stored on anything that leaves the building
  • A compromise between the two, such as allowing proprietary data to leave the office but no private customer data. At least that avoids the dreaded letters from going out to customers.

    No matter which option is chosen—and there are plenty of other alternatives, of course—enforcement will be next to impossible. The only practical enforcement tool is the most unpleasant one: "Here are the rules and we take them seriously. We’re not going to search you and the security guard won’t search your laptop for SS numbers. But if your laptop gets stolen or damaged and we later learn that such data was on it, you’re fired and we might even have to sue you. Are you willing to take that risk?"

    It’s the kind of a memo that IT management hates sending, but retailers must decide how to strike the right balance on customer data.

    Personally, I’d encourage the inbetween step. After all, it’s better to compromise on your data policy than to have your policies compromise your data.

  • advertisement

    One Comment | Read The Data Dilemma: Productivity Vs. Protection

    1. Theo Says:

      I thought this line was wonderful!

      “A card for every occasion, when you care enough to breach the very best.”


    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.