The Fastest Way To A Bank’s Heart Is Through Its Restaurant’s Security Hole

Written by Frank Hayes
November 27th, 2010

Here’s another reason banks should crack down on restaurants about security: to protect the bank. Seattle police and the U.S. Secret Service are investigating an Oct. 22 cybertheft in which a thief from outside the U.S. broke into the systems of a privately owned Seattle restaurant, the Broadway Grill. From there, the attacker tunneled into servers of the restaurant’s payment-card processor and stole at least 1,000 stored card numbers from the acquirer. Investigators won’t identify the card processor or the country the attack was launched from, but they said the data was definitely taken from the acquirer and not the restaurant.

The National Retail Federation has been saying for years that retailers should get out of the payment-card protection game entirely. NRF’s thinking is that banks are inherently more secure than retailers and that just keeping card data off retailers’ systems will make everything safe from attackers. True, the restaurant’s first-time owners, who bought the place in June, aren’t security experts. But they’re not the ones who lost the card data. Until retailers get rid of card numbers and beef up security and acquirers harden their own systems a lot further, those attacks will just keep coming.


One Comment | Read The Fastest Way To A Bank’s Heart Is Through Its Restaurant’s Security Hole

  1. pcidssguy Says:

    It should come as no surprise that there was another breach in a restaurant. A lot of work by many parties is needed to curtail that.

    What is surprising is why the acquirer isn’t getting exposed in the press. Their systems must have some real flaws that passed PCI DSS scrutiny for an attack like this to be successful. More should be shared about this to prevent future attacks.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.