The Rebirth of a Dead E-Commerce Site

Written by Evan Schuman
April 10th, 2005

Back in May 1999, near the height of the dot-com insanity, one of a host of media darlings was an underwear sales dot-com called Sending boxer shorts to various reporters, this dot-com was written up in BusinessWeek and the New York Daily News, and it made Time Magazine’s picks for the best e-commerce sites.

All this for a company that?at its height?had six employees and barely broke out of six figures of annual corporate revenue, according to then-CEO Jeff Johnson. But none of that mattered.

The Web was then seen as the great equalizer, allowing tiny garage players to compete on an equal footing with multibillion-dollar commerce giants. The owner of Calvin Klein’s underwear unit offered to buy for $3 million, Johnson said.

Well, the dot-com bubble burst in mid-2000, and by May 2002, closed its doors. A brief run for a briefs company. Those times are gone, many concluded, and it’s back to big business?the pre-Web ways.

One of those apparel mavens who knew the good old ways was Jack Stone, whose parents started his company?Stone International?back in 1933. After’s demise, Stone’s private-label underwear business, based in Columbia, S.C., picked up and he found himself selling $60 million worth of underwear to other old-fashioned, nonvirtual outfits including Target, Sears, Kmart and Marshalls. (No Wal-Mart, and Stone said that was quite deliberate.)

Fast-forward to 2005. Brick-and-mortar retailers have fallen in love with another Internet technology and have found themselves being able to communicate and share data with global partners?even tiny ones?with never-before-experienced ease.

In rapid succession, Stone saw those prized retail accounts decide they could outsource their underwear business to Asian companies for a tiny fraction of what his American workforce demanded.

What did Stone do? He made some calls, found’s Johnson?doing entirely unrelated work?and made him an offer: Come back to the underwear biz and relaunch, this time bankrolled with Stone’s non-Web-earned dollars.

If retailers such as Target and Sears could use direct deals with cheap overseas labor to cut their costs, Stone figured that he could use the Web to cut his. Can an older and wiser Web site beat the big boys this time?

When Stone saw the direction the retailers were moving in in 2004, he started planning his next moves. The first thing he did was invest in fellow South Carolina company Byte Software, which specializes in apparel software, particularly EDI and other supply-chain magic. Johnson dubbed the combo “the South Carolina cluster.”

That software allowed Stone to “manage at an SKU level apparel all through the supply chain,” but it didn’t give him the connection to the consumer, which was his end-run plan against the retailers. If they bypassed him and went straight to his stitchers in Asia, he’d bypass them and sell his popular underwear lines straight to the retailers’ consumers.

Stone saw a resurrected as his ticket to those consumers.

The funny thing is that all of the players in this saga saw their rise and fall influenced by how well they used technology. And Stone contends that the large retail chains are “in for a pretty rude awakening” as they increase how often they are dealing directly with overseas stitchers.

Why a rude awakening? The chains will be absorbing more of the risk, which is standard as corporate go-betweens are eliminated. That risk can be mitigated and managed by wise use of supply-chain technology and accurate predictions of demand.

Accurate predictions? Wise use of technology? Stone says you can’t use those phrases and most retailers?Wal-Mart not included?in the same sentence.

Target, Sears, Kmart and Marshalls?which Stone painted as “all equally bad”?”would give us 11-week forecasts and you would not believe how poor they are in predicting their own businesses.”’s Johnson said market realities gave Stone little choice but to fight back. The retailers “had pushed them out of the way to go overseas directly,” Johnson said. “We’re now going to carry all of the brands that the department stores were, plus we will trickle in our own brands.”’s brands (such as Ntense, positioned as underwear for athletic people) were the ones that they had been private labeling for the retailers. So, the customized underwear that consumers had been purchasing under the retail names will now be available to them directly?at presumably lower prices?via’s site. Stone and “will be using all of our infrastructure to sell directly to consumers and undercut the retailers.”

Johnson makes an interesting?although dubious?projection that a lot of the more interesting, now-defunct Web sites will be brought back to life, now that the Web environment is more stable and consumers are more willing to embrace e-commerce.

“I suspect you will see many more of the Internet pioneers, like, coming back online now that Google and are demonstrating real success and consumers are using the Internet with more ease and comfort,” Johnson said. “Shopping from your home in your underwear for underwear is a wonderful convenience.”

The greatest irony: A 72-year-old apparel corporation is turning to a defunct Web startup because of its depth of experience. That’s like looking at Marc Andreessen as a village elder. Even more frightening is the fact that, in effect, he now is.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.