The Spy Who Shopped Me

Written by Evan Schuman
July 8th, 2010

When federal agents arrested a group and accused them of being Russian spies, the media quickly turned its attention to a particular spy, one Anna Chapman. A model who appeared to be sent from Central Casting for either a James Bond film or to play Natasha in a Bullwinkle movie (she also has a decent resemblance to Mata Hari, but this story is strange enough as is). This Russian spy case, though, has two key elements impacting retail IT: the spies’ use of steganography to embed images on public Web sites, plus some blatantly bogus retail purchases that no store detected.

First, the retail store moves. Chapman was observed walking into a Brooklyn, N.Y., CVS and then a Verizon store before going into a Rite Aid and back to Verizon. (The store changes were supposed to prevent her from being followed. According to the FBI surveillance report, it didn’t work very well.)

But when she went into the Verizon store to obtain a Motorola phone and some calling cards for overseas communications, she filled out her application using a customer address of “99 Fake Street.” Let’s set aside for the moment the obvious espionage question (as in “What self-respecting spies would draw attention to themselves with such an answer?”). What was the store associate who reviewed that form thinking?

Cell phones are known to potentially be dangerous, whether for making communications or remotely setting off explosives. Do associates handling mobile devices understand the implications?

Is IT setting any mechanism to verify the authenticity of such answers? Should it?

Onto the E-Commerce issues. The term “national security” is used far too often and rarely with the proper seriousness. But strangely enough, the alleged Russian spies’ use of public Web sites to secretly broadcast messages back to headquarters raises true security concerns that go way beyond one chain trying to get an early heads up on a rival’s upcoming sales event.

If spies or terrorists wanted to use this approach, the idea is for their bosses to be able to look at their messages without prompting any suspicions. The best way to do that is for the images to be placed on very well-known sites. What triggers could be set off by someone visiting or Amazon?

This suggests that making an E-Commerce site tamper-proof is now crucial and could truly be a matter of national security. Most security efforts are focused on protecting payment card data and other private customer and retail information. What security does your site have on images?

What about image security on your mobile site?

Better yet, what about image protection on cache versions? A little cloud assistance for uptime? If so, remember that it’s been less than a year since Sears was taught its cache lesson. That’s when pranksters used the Akamai system that Sears was using to rename an outdoor cooking device as “grills to cook babies.”

That Sears matter was only detected and stopped because the images were visible and prompted loud complaints. Had they been invisible—unless you know the exact process to decode it, along with the proper software—it’s likely those images may have gone undetected for months, assuming they would ever have been discovered.

Frightening thought for the day: How would your E-Commerce team feel if your site was secretly used by Al Qaeda to launch another attack against civilians? It’s the small things that never get fixed. In this case, the alleged Russian spies have given us a harm-free heads up. The question is: Will we do anything about it?


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.