Time To Encrypt (Again): Researcher Says Data Over Cell Networks Is Easy To Read

Written by Frank Hayes
August 11th, 2011

Many mobile-commerce transactions running on GSM smartphones are easy to intercept and monitor, according to a presentation on Wednesday (August 10) at the Chaos Computer Camp hacking conference in Germany. Cryptographer Karsten Nohl of Security Research Labs was researching how well cell-phone data was secured when he discovered that most GSM cell operators (in the U.S. that’s AT&T and T-Mobile) use either weak encryption or none at all on the GPRS networks that carry their phones’ data. (Newer 3G networks use better encryption, but wherever there’s not enough 3G, phones fall back to GPRS.)

Nohl told The New York Times that mobile operators turn off GPRS encryption “to be able to monitor traffic, to detect and suppress Skype, or to filter viruses, in a decentralized fashion.” Unfortunately, that also means thieves with reprogrammed mobile phones can eavesdrop on many M-Commerce transactions using GSM smartphones. And even if payment-card information gets its own layer of encryption, there’s still plenty of other personal data that customers would probably prefer not to fall into the hands of thieves.

This being a presentation at a hacker conference, Nohl’s report includes all the information necessary to reprogram some older GSM phones so they can monitor GPRS traffic that’s not encrypted at all, on networks like those of Italy’s mobile carriers TIM and Wind, in an effort to shame them into improving their security. (He’s withholding details of how to crack the encryption that’s merely weak. Gosh, thanks, guy.)

In practice, it’s not likely that mobile operators will start using strong encryption anytime soon, even though the networks are designed to use it. Between the desire of carriers to block Skype and the desire of governments to be able to monitor wireless data traffic easily, there’s just too much on the weak-encryption side of the argument.

That not only keeps M-Commerce transactions at risk but also endangers in-store use of GSM mobile phones or tablets, whether they’re serving as POS devices, checking inventory or handling any other sensitive data.

Locking down that data with encryption of your own—or simply running everything through a VPN—is a pain. But considering that what one hacker can discover, other hackers will re-create, you have to assume those reprogrammed mobile phones will be showing up soon in the hands of data thieves at a shopping mall near you.


One Comment | Read Time To Encrypt (Again): Researcher Says Data Over Cell Networks Is Easy To Read

  1. Branden Williams Says:

    Why on earth do people trust the network layer anymore? ESPECIALLY when wires are not required? Ite baffles and appalls me that software vendors negligently leave data protection out of the equation.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.