Tokenization, Meet Account Updater

Written by Evan Schuman
October 21st, 2009

Some six years after both MasterCard and Visa enabled retailers to automatically update credit card information—a capability that many chains never opted to use—Cybersource on Monday (Oct. 19) said that it is automating that process for its customers but added a nice twist: It would automatically update the tokens that replaced the changed cards.

This approach isn’t much of a technological innovation. All the vendor is doing is adding a script that leverages the data the brands have been offering for years. But it’s a script that no one else has yet bothered to create. That said, given the number of retailers that never chose to use the original services, it’s unclear how many will jump at this new feature.

The original card brand programs—the Visa Account Updater (VAU) and MasterCard’s Automatic Billing Updater (ABU)—were set up so that when an expiration date changed or a card number was replaced, the retailer could be automatically notified so that the customer—especially those on recurring billings—didn’t have to be bothered or disrupted.

Todd Ablowitz, president of the Double Diamond Group and a payment consultant (who has no ties to Cybersource—at least none that we could find), said he thinks the move is logical and has strong potential.

“My favorite type of product release is the ‘a-ha’ product release, like this one. All the ingredients have been here for years. Consumers hate getting that nasty-gram from a recurrent biller saying that their card—which was probably cancelled due to fraud, a lost card or a data breach—was declined,” Ablowitz said. “The card brands rolled out updater services years ago, allowing retailers to avoid that awful customer experience. The only problem is that it appeared no one was using them. Now there’s a service that not only includes the account update service and automates it, but it’s integrated into their tokenization process. That means the retailer never needs to see the differences in their card info. To me, that’s powerful.”

What the vendor is stressing is the tokenization integration. Cybersource is arguing that other services would likely force retailers to detokenize (is that a word?) their tokens before they could be updated, which would briefly create a security problem because the full card data would again be in the clear.

Of course, this approach only works if the customer is already paying for Cybersource tokens. Also, even Cybersource officials are not suggesting that this is rocket science, so it’s likely that others will follow if this program gets any traction.


2 Comments | Read Tokenization, Meet Account Updater

  1. Toby Galino Says:

    You neglected to mention that hefty charge you got hit with for having a late recurring payment – even if it was just an expiration date change. That use to steam me up, it was an annual phone call for my club memberships.

  2. Cecille Soriano Says:

    It would really be good if they’ll do it as added service not another way of cashing in on customers like me.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.