advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

U.S. Retailers Tip-Toe Through Mobile Commerce Minefields

August 13th, 2009

In some ways, the current state of M-Commerce is reminiscent of the days before broadband Internet access was widely available. Companies with fancy Web sites risked angering users still stuck with dial-up, folks who didn’t want to wait five minutes for complex pages to load. With mobile, retailers need to strike a balance, presenting sites with enough functionality to enable decent product search, selection and payment while remaining cognizant that not everybody owns an iPhone (and even those that do are limited by that device’s restrictions). Indeed, only about five percent of cellphone users have joined the Apple-ites. “There are still tens of millions of Motorola RAZRs out there,” Slezak said. “You don’t want to alienate them but you still want to give those with the better phones the best experience possible to turn them into (Mobile Web) junkies.”

Today, the iPhone may be the most powerful M-Commerce platform, but it’s way of presenting data sometimes presents limitations that less sophisticated phones avoid. (On our own site, the iPhone has difficulty seeing stories with multiple pages, something much lower-level phones can handle easily. Apple’s going its own proprietary way is not always a plus.)

The list of M-Commerce challenges and potential pitfalls is long and subject to debate. Some, such as the high expense of mobile data plans and the painfully slow rollout of high-speed (3G and beyond) wireless networks in the U.S., involve issues beyond the control of tech teams working on M-Commerce deployments. However, there are plenty of M-Commerce headaches that are primarily technological in nature:

  • Lack of standardization, forcing developers to craft multiple mobile sites that can deal with myriad devices, multiple browsers and various screen sizes
  • Sites that don’t automatically recognize when a user is coming in through a mobile device, sending them to the full-fledged site. Not all retailers with mobile sites even have a consistent way of notifying its visitors that a mobile site exists.
  • Inability by many mobile browsers to handle the complex, processor-taxing technology that drives regular E-Commerce, such as Ajax, Flash and Java
  • Difficulty crafting systems that can continually check for problems in the delivery of mobile pages when phone vendors update, upgrade or retire devices and browsers
  • Mobile carrier backlash and content restrictions
  • Glitches when presenting purchase pages due to improper device discovery and rendering
  • Headaches in maintaining secure transaction frameworks for customers
  • Uncertainties about controlling costs for outsourced technology and services
  • Unforeseen issues when integrating into existing POSes
    Some of these issues are major obstacles, but little things can also effectively mess up an M-Commerce site. It won’t take long for impatient mobile users to give up if retail sites force them to scroll in various directions or otherwise search for tools, such as “Add to Cart” buttons. This is triply true if the site design doesn’t indicate to the user that there is anything they need to search for.

    Another booby-trap is a site’s shipping and payment procedure. Filling out forms is bad enough with a full-size keyboard. Doing it with a cellphone is enough to make even the most enthusiastic M-Commerce experimenter disconnect.


  • advertisement

    One Comment | Read U.S. Retailers Tip-Toe Through Mobile Commerce Minefields

    1. Todd Leiser Says:

      Very well written piece. Thank you. The Amazon experience is amazing and gives them yet another leg up on brick & mortar. By the time traditional retailers figure this out I (and others?) will have already emotionally, habitually, and financially committed themselves to Amazon’s experience for many products, and to your point, leave them where they were in the dialup-to-broadband transition years.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.