Visa Changing Its PCI Rules

Written by Evan Schuman
July 22nd, 2006

Visa on July 21 changed its retail security requirement structure, which will?because of a change in definition of what a qualifying transaction is–have the impact of forcing more retailers to use its more stringent security procedures.

The core change is including all transactions when determining what level a retailer should be. Before, the criteria was limited to online purchases. “The most significant modification involves the Level 2 merchant category, which previously only applied to merchants processing between 150,000 and 6 million Visa e-commerce transactions per year,” a Visa statement said. “Level 2 has now been broadened to include all acceptance channels and applies to any merchant processing 1 million to 6 million Visa transactions per year.”

Mark Rasch, a former federal prosecutor who today serves as VP for Solutionary, said that July 21’s actions may not have an immediate impact on retailers, but it will certainly have a long-term impact as Visa uses this as the first step before cracking down with strict enforcement.

“I would say that this is more evolutionary than revolutionary,” Rasch said. “What they’re doing is they’re tweaking the standards, trying to redefine who the classes of different merchants are and what the obligations of each of those different classes are going to be.”

Rasch questions whether categorizing merchants solely by the number of transactions is the best approach.

“I don’t know that that’s necessarily the best measure of how sophisticated a merchant you are and how much security you’re going to need,” Rasch said. “One of the things you may want to look at is the dollar value of the transactions or the risks of the transactions themselves. If you do a lot of small dollar value transactions, you may be more or less risky than a person who does a fewer number of high dollar transactions.”

Retail technology analysts who discussed the new Visa PCI rules in a Web audiocast late on July 21st agreed that the changes will almost certainly impact a lot more than thousand or so merchants that Visa said it will impact, as the changes will likely all retailers to be more strict about credit card authentication issues.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.