Visa: Large Retailer PCI Compliance Hits 65 Percent

Written by Evan Schuman
October 25th, 2007

Visa on Wednesday reported that some 65 percent of the nation’s largest retailers are now compliant with the industry standard Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI). That’s roughly an 81 percent increase from the numbers released in December 2006 and a 63 percent increase from the figures released in July.

Although the numbers do show a sharp increase, they also reflect the fact that 35 percent—more than one out of every three—large retailers today are still not PCI compliant, despite the passing of the Sept. 30 deadline and the start of the promised $25,000/month fines for non-compliance.

On a potentially even more scary note, Visa reported that PCI compliance among the more numerous Level 2 retailers—who process between one million and six million Visa transactions a year—is only at 43 percent, as of Sept. 30, 2007.

On the optimistic side of those Level 2 numbers, the Level 2 compliance was barely 15 percent in December 2006 and 33 percent in July, so this does show a healthy increase. Also, the deadline for Level 2 retailers doesn’t kick in until New Year’s Eve of this year so it’s possible those numbers could sharply increase again by January.

Then again, most Level 2 retailers will have their hands full from late October through late December, so it’s not certain how much of an increase will materialize.

Visa issued a statement that that it wants to see the compliance—and not the penalty revenue—go up. "We’d much rather grow compliance than levy fines," said said Michael E. Smith, senior vice president of Enterprise Risk and Compliance for the U.S. market, Visa Inc. "We’re making steady progress in accelerating merchant compliance with PCI standards to protect cardholder information."

A promising note was Visa saying that 99 percent of Level 1 and Level 2 retailers "confirmed they are not storing prohibited account data such as magnetic stripe–also known as track data–CVV2 (the security code on the back of the card) and PIN data." That’s up from the 96 percent that Visa reported in July. Those sets of prohibited data are seen as especially attractive to data thieves.


One Comment | Read Visa: Large Retailer PCI Compliance Hits 65 Percent

  1. Steve Sommers Says:

    This is not grounds for celebration. Based on Visa’s own estimates, they have “solved”, at most, 9.75% of the problem in 6+ years (15% * 65%). This represents $0.14B of an estimated $1.46B problem!


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.