advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Wal-Mart Thief: Fake Pregnancy, Fake Barcode, Fake Shoplift, Real Stupid

October 14th, 2010

Moore said this tactic is actually not uncommon; some people think that whoever calls the police first won’t get charged. It didn’t quite work out that way in this case. When the police arrived, Moore said, the women presented altered state identification cards. “On the back is a magnetic strip and she had mutilated that. And there was a scannable barcode” that had been scratched to be unusable and one of the sisters had “marked it up to change the letters and the numbers.”

That prompted the police to re-review the video. Afterward, they concluded that a shoplifting charge would stick, because the two sisters had walked past the final POS station without paying. It was then that Katurah Petty said that she was pregnant (she wasn’t) and that her water had broken (it hadn’t, but the lack of pregnancy pretty much covered that).

Police took her to the hospital, where she refused to let the medical staff examine her. But, Moore said, she was a good enough actress to convince the medical team—and the police with her—that she was indeed about to give birth. The police let her go home, as she refused treatment, fearing that she could deliver in jail.

Meanwhile, police removed the car the pair had driven and discovered computer monitors and three Avery sticker labels, cut and shaped to match what Wal-Mart uses. Moore said the material discovered would typically be used to fabricate Wal-Mart receipts and then have the barcode match those numbers. This system was prompted by Wal-Mart’s efforts to match receipt numbers with the barcodes of products being returned, Moore said.

The next day, Katurah Petty met with her parole officer. (Why a parole officer? It involved a Louisiana conviction for possession—with two co-defendants—of marijuana. Specifically, 30 pounds of marijuana. Petty was the driver.) She told her parole officer that she had never been pregnant and that she made it up to get out of going to jail.

Another boring day at Wal-Mart loss prevention.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.