advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Want To Buy Tokens? Pretend It’s A Marketing Program

March 20th, 2012

In itself, a tokenization solution is not a loyalty platform, but it is one element of a foundation for one. Figuring out how to track customer purchases for loyalty offers is one of the most difficult components of building a loyalty program. Asking customers to carry a piece of plastic is so 1990s.

That being said, tokenization is a great place to start. First, you must make sure that your tokenization vendor provides a consistent token for a credit-card transaction. Next, the token is only the identifier. You must build or buy a campaign management system that does something with that identifier.

You must also be careful about how and if you implement Track 2 data (hint: don’t). Although it may be tempting to leverage the Track 2 data for customer information other than the PAN, Track 2 data is still considered card data and, therefore, is covered by PCI. It may hurt, but you need customers to provide their data again—just like you would with any other loyalty program.

Doing so is a good idea for two reasons: First, it enables customers to implicitly opt-in to loyalty offers versus being freaked out that you are tracking their purchases. Second, it enables you to capture their cell-phone numbers, which are critical for a mobile loyalty offering.

Finally, you need to work with your POS provider (or some other point of purchase technology) to build a redemption system for your loyalty platform. This enables you to build a closed-loop system that, in turn, enables you to quantitatively track the ROI of your loyalty marketing campaigns.

Warning: By implementing this marketing system you may increase your information security. It is strongly recommended that you utilize hardware encryption to implement your new loyalty solution. Side effects may include reduced PCI scope. Consult your QSA if your PCI scope does not reduce after implementing.

What do you think? If you disagree (or even, heaven forbid, agree), please comment below or send me a private message. Or check out the Twitter discussion on @todd_michaud.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.