Where Does TJX Lie On The Naughty-Nice Line?

Written by Evan Schuman
December 24th, 2007

Almost all of the banks and bank associations still suing TJX agreed to settle for undisclosed sums on Wednesday, in an anticipated move following the collapse of bank’s the federal class-action lawsuit against TJX. This all stems from the worst-ever data breach in credit card history, impacting more than 100 million credit/debit cards.

TJX issued a statement Wednesday evening that it had worked out settlement agreements with "all but one of the seven banks and bankers associations" that had sued TJX. The bank holding its ground is Alabama-based Amerifirst Bank.

TJX CEO Carol Meyrowitz issued a statement that TJX has finally achieved PCI compliance. While stressing that it was not releasing the particulars of the settlement, TJX’s statement said "the amount paid by TJX primarily reimbursed the settling bankers associations and banks for a negotiated portion of the expenses they incurred in this case," although the banks issued a statement that the compensation specifically excluded attorney’s fees.

As part of the settlement, the three bank associations involved—the Massachusetts Bankers Association, the Connecticut Bankers Association and the Maine Association of Community Banks—officially endorsed a TJX settlement with Visa.

"This alternative recovery solution will, in many cases, allow issuing banks to recover more than would otherwise be possible through existing recovery mechanisms," said MBA President Daniel Forte. "The associations advise our members which are Visa issuers to review and favorably consider the offer structured by Visa and where appropriate, accept it prior to the December 19, 2007 deadline."

Presumably, the bank association had been worked out earlier, as it’s hard to see that an endorsement announced at 5:11 PM on Dec. 18 would do much good in getting banks to agree to very complicated settlement terms by Dec. 19.

Legally, this case was a major uphill battle for both the consumers and the banks suing TJX because the essence of their cases was trying to prove that TJX was reckless in protecting consumer credit card data. And yet there is no federal or state law that requires a company to take prudent care of such data, which forces plaintiffs to get creative. One key claim, for example, was that TJX committed a fraud to these banks by not having volunteered how weak its security was.

The cases then came down to the quintessential civil court issue of making victims whole. But consumers lost virtually no money—thanks to zero-liability credit card programs—and most bank losses were either small or, TJX successfully argued, were the result of their decisions to take no chances and cancel credit cards, against what TJX also argued was industry standard procedure.

Once a federal judge dismissed the attempt for class-certification last month and forced banks to pursue the cases individually at the state level, most of the cases were doomed because few banks wanted to bother funding their own lawsuits, especially when they would have to pay to start all over again in state court.

Knowing this, TJX took what some bank attorneys have considered overly aggressive negotiation tactics. One bank in Tennessee, for example, had provable fraud losses of more than $150,000, but was offered a settlement of exactly $68, said Joe Whatley, one of the bank attorneys involved in the cases.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.