Will Customers Scan Their Own Items While Waiting On Line?

Written by Evan Schuman
June 15th, 2006

A Los Altos, CA, technology vendor called SmartTools thinks that customers should stop lollygagging around in the cashier checkout lanes. While waiting, they should be scanning their own items and saving the cashier’s time. If you find this idea attractive, we need to chat. (Hint: This is not an especially good career-advancement purchase.)

The tradition of anti-customer service began in earnest with self-checkout systems. These have proved popular with people who don’t want to deal with cashiers and who think the short lines are because no one else has figured out how efficient those machines can be.

Officials at Los Altos-based SmartTools see an opportunity in an inbetween step, where customers can wait on a long time to see a cashier, but they can scan their own items while waiting. This is an impressive worst of both worlds scenario: they get to scan their own groceries and wait on a long line for a cashier.

SmartTools has posted diagrams showing how their system could be integrated into a typical retail checkout lane. The service will cost retailers about $400 per lane, said SmartTools’ Byron Siu, but retailers find that a good price. Their concern, Siu said, was the absence of a good method to verify that the customer has scanned everything.

That’s certainly a good concern, but there’s a more fundamental issue here. Why would the customer do it? Are they offering a discount? (No, as if you didn’t already know.)

Worse yet, what message is this sending to your customers? Is this improving the customer’s experience? Offering them lower prices? Faster checkout? (Not really, as they still have to wait for the cashier to take payment and to do some kind of authentication.) Better services? Improved selection?

As for the verification, the retail pressures to push products through the checkout line as quickly as possible does not bode well for cashiers accurately verifying that all products have been properly scanned. Remember what happened to Wal-Mart last year? A barcode scam was staggeringly successful because it depended on the apathy of strangers. Pressure a cashier to keep products moving as fast as possible and threaten almost no consequences if a shoplifter gets through their aisle and you have a recipe for Shrink Du Jour.

Sometimes, an effort that truly seems to be good customer service backfires, which is what Best Buy discovered when it offered to take back defective hard-drives and safely dispose of them. Unfortunately, a Best Buy customer found one of his old hard-drives?repaired, the customer’s personal and financial data fully intact, and quite undestroyed?being sold at flea market.

Longtime industry observer Paula Rosenblum <a href="
“>blogs about this trend away from customer service at the RetailMatters blog and makes the case that retailers have forgotten how to respect their customer.

Is biometric authentication a courtesy or an insult? Is shifting merchandise location to encourage aisle walking a sign of respect?

The courtesy card comes with discounts?which is great?but many retailers automatically give those discounts to everyone by swiping a generic loyalty card for outsiders. That brief flicker of positive reinforcement that perhaps our chain truly does value your loyal shopping is obliterated when regular customers see cashiers giving the discounts to everyone.

We’ve written about how a true customer-friendly CRM program would do more than provide small discounts. With its ability to analyze purchases and tie them into individual customers, it could also use that knowledge to alert customers to recalls or other problems. Now that would generate some serious loyalty and show some respect. How many retailers have you seen doing it?

There’s no question that technology can dramatically help retailers boost efficiency, increase sales and improve profitability. But that’s only true to the extent that the technology is seen helping customers in some ways. Think of the latest generation of smartcarts as a great example of technology and customer respect working together.

Think about that the next time you get frustrated at a customer that is wasting time in a checkout lane, flipping through a magazine, when they could be scanning in groceries. After all, what the heck do they think they’re being paid for?


One Comment | Read Will Customers Scan Their Own Items While Waiting On Line?

  1. Tina-Marie Virkus Says:

    I feel compelled, as a Customer Service professional with over twenty years in the field, to relay a recent experience of mine that, ironically, took place in a WalMart. As I was standing in the check-out line with a friend I witnessed a customer in the self-serve lane attempt to scan their own items to no avail. Swiping the same item over a dozen times produced no result other than annoying the customer waiting behind them and forcing every other line to become more crowded as people moved over.
    What was the cashier, who was only, what, 3 1/2 feet
    away, doing? Her nails.
    Attractive? Not really.
    Last time in WalMart? Definitely, because a portion of every dollar spent there goes to her paycheck, and the paycheck of the person in charge of her job performance, and the salary of the person who hired them, all the way up to the executive (who just bought a house in the Hamptons) who made the decision to have those self-serve lines that blatantly ignore the customer and their needs by (wo)manning them with wanna-be manicurists.
    The result? Business 101, people! Higher prices.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.