Wireless Deadbolt, Burglar Alarm Access. What’s Wrong With This Picture?

Written by Evan Schuman
April 1st, 2009

It’s one of those worrisome judgment calls. When a vendor puts out a ludicrously bad idea in a news release dated April 1, do we assume it’s intended to be a joke or that this is the same kind of bizarre thinking that we see examples of all year round? Black & Decker is forcing us to make that decision.

In a statement issued Wednesday (April 1), Black & Decker introduced a series of wireless devices that can unlock door keyknobs and deadbolts as well as deactivating burglar alarms, presumably at the International Security Conference and Exposition in Las Vegas.

“Black & Decker’s unique motorized deadbolt throws the bolt electronically and provides the ability to lock or unlock doors via remote control, Web-enabled mobile phone, security system touch panel and/or a secure Internet connection,” the statement said. “This approach is an advancement over other competitive offerings that still require a person to manually turn the bolt to lock or unlock the door.”

The statement references the anticipation of more burglaries because of the recession. Well, this is certainly a sharp improvement over the crowbar, which generally can only disable the doors and not the security system and has a high noise-to-shutup ratio. Everyone knows that wireless access—especially for a consumer product—is quite secure and no respectable intruder would dare attempt to wirelessly access such devices without authorization. That’s against the law.

And, yes, the connection here to retail technology or E-Commerce is ultra-thin, other than the fact that retailers have enjoyed more than their share of wireless intrusions. But it’s a hard story to resist.



StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.