advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Would Mobile Have Helped Retailers During Hurricane Irene’s Power Outages?

September 7th, 2011

The nature of mobile’s power needs is such that very low-tech options could exist, depending on how widespread the power outage is. Do many associates live outside out the outage area? Could they bring the iPad—or whatever mobile device is needed—into the store from home? And then perhaps use staggered shifts to bring in freshly powered devices? Hardly efficient, but if it makes the difference between being able to operate or not, it’s worth considering.

Therein lies one interesting takeaway from Irene’s destruction: the level of marketing differentiation possible by a generator and/or creative power plans. When Irene hit areas not accustomed to long power-less durations—in our area of Northern New Jersey, stores that hadn’t seen outages of more than 50 minutes in two decades were dealing with as many as six or seven days of power-less retailing—most merchants just shut down. The few who had invested in high-end generators along with ample fuel to sustain operations for more than a week, however, found themselves the only game in town.

They were swamped with appreciative customers who spent far more than normal. Those customers were often first-timers who were impressed with the new store they discovered, powered partly by the emotional appreciation that the store had the foresight to invest in sufficient back-up power.

Typically, when a chain moves into a new town, it mimics what other merchants have done. “Should we get a generator? Only if the locals have, given that they know this community best.” Interestingly enough, it was the retailers who chose to go it alone that ended up benefitting the most.

Some veteran retailers remembered the pre-POS days, when they used mechanical cash registers immune to power outages. If only during daylight, most believed that, were it not for POS, they could have functioned. It made more than a few think hard about a mobile future.

Of course, even an almost perfect power-outage plan won’t guarantee an advantage over competitors who have gone dark. Two days after the storm passed, I had to make the rounds of stores, trying to purchase some repair products to fix storm damage. Most were closed due to lack of power. One store that had power—Home Depot—was inaccessible due to closed roads and washed-out bridges.

And even the generator route was challenging. There are two primary fuels for generators: gasoline and natural gas. Many gas stations sold out of gasoline, and closed roads prevented them from getting quickly resupplied, due to evacuation demand plus tons of consumers and businesses purchasing gallons of the stuff for their own generators. So the gasoline route would have required a retailer to have stockpiled a huge amount of gasoline. Those who stockpiled a more nominal amount found themselves running out of fuel within hours or a day or two.

Natural gas, though, has its own issues. It has a much better supply, is not bothered by closed roads and requires no stockpiling. But the flood waters caused disruptions in some natural gas lines.

Mobile and generators won’t be a cure-all for the next extended power outage. But if they could even salvage 20 percent of sales, that might be enough to cut losses and generate an awful lot of customer loyalty.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Would Mobile Have Helped Retailers During Hurricane Irene’s Power Outages?

  1. Mobile Guy Says:

    If this places mobile devices in the hands of the employees, that would further reduce potential POS friction and allow for more in-store sales under these circumstances.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.